Wish I had thunk of this.
...Setting aside the transparent timing of the declaration today; which
is entirely based upon the reality of interlopers within our current
government remaining focused on undermining President Trump policy and
objectives; and accepting the anti-Russia propaganda narrative is a
political weapon intended to elevate the interests of deep state
officials and undermine any effort that might be adverse to their
interests; a basic question about the indictment evidence is being
avoided by all who are reviewing the content therein….
While the DOJ document is full of detailed accusations; which has
given the narrative engineers a great deal of fuel; there’s a specific
aspect missing. The entire indictment (full pdf below)
is based on the premise of the FBI conducting some -unexplained and
unsubstantiated- form of forensic data-analysis to formulate their
However, can anyone explain how this FBI forensic data-analysis was
possible when the FBI was never allowed access to the DCCC, DNC and
Clinton Campaign servers?...
Oh, yah! The FBI was told to go pound sand when they asked for the servers, remember?
Well, there's another possibility, and it's a bit darker: the FBI actually DID get access to those servers and has buried what they found out--except what they will NEVER NEED for the indictments, which is called "proof." IOW, Mueller, a Certified Member of the Deep State, knew exactly what Hillary & Co. were doing--and exactly who was spying on her--and they don't give a rotten damn, so they lied about 'not getting the servers.'
Either way, Mueller is clearly Stzrok's father by another mother.
Now comes American Greatness with another enticing theory!
...A lot of ordinary folks wonder why
the DNC wouldn’t let any outside parties examine their server. Instead,
the FBI accepted the word of CrowdStrike, a private contractor hired by
the DNC, without any independent confirmation.
And a bunch of not so ordinary folks
who know a thing or two about computers thinks there may be a simple
explanation for the DNC’s unwillingness to let outsiders have a peek at
the evidence: There isn’t any. The
Russian hacking that’s caused so much division and turmoil at home and
abroad never really happened. It was all a ruse concocted by
One such skeptic is an anonymous journalist and computer aficionado who goes by the pseudonym “Adam Carter.” Carter has spent the last couple of years cataloging evidence,
unearthed by himself and others, that CrowdStrike engaged in a
disinformation campaign, inventing not just a fake Russian hack but also
a fake hacker called “Guccifer 2.0.”...
Well, I'm sure of this: Mueller will secure convictions of all the Russkis he has named. And I'm also certain that every one of those Russkis will have the StrzokSmirk plastered to their face.
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Post a Comment