Recognize Totalitarianism when you see it. Dostoevsky did.
... We cannot have both bread and freedom, because we refuse to share. Better to forego freedom, to avoid making choices and cultivating virtue through adversity, all for an uncertain and merely free future. Better to cease to be the human created in God’s image, to give up hope of deification and union with God as true happiness.
The few who will then be the ruling elite or vanguard will be the only ones who suffer under this final arrangement, for they will know that they are deceiving the masses. “This deceit will constitute our suffering.” The masses will submit for a “quiet, humble happiness, the happiness of feeble creatures.”
Those so ruled “will have no secrets from us. We will allow or forbid them to live with their wives and mistresses, to have or not to have children – all depending on their obedience – and they will submit to us gladly and joyfully. . . .And everyone will be happy.”
Dostoevsky was writing into the teeth of modern science and its political variant, socialism, which promised heaven on earth, a heaven whose only responsibility was obedience. These forces responded not just to the weak human inclination to find freedom burdensome, but also to the human hope for a universal material and political solution to the problems of the human condition, and to the evil that pushed Ivan to despair.
Dostoevsky knew that no such magical solution can allow us to be free without suffering....
Read that penultimate graf again. Again.
Now you understand the last line.
