We will skip to the parts of this column which really matter. The National Security parts.
...Notice how the media always present the verbiage of the dockworker’s employers as “employers’ group USMX,” without actually noting the employers’ group are the port owners, multinational shipping conglomerates and as a consequence, foreign countries.
In material fact, most critical ports in the USA are owned by foreign entities. As a result, the ILA are striking against the ideological, political and financial interests of mostly foreign entities (USMX)....
Oh. Well, that makes a difference, no?
It makes a helluva big difference! Why? The "automation" thing:
... In Asia and Europe, port automation is happening rapidly. However, in Asia and Europe they have rules and regulations against foreign ownership of their ports. In Europe, Asia and particularly China, ports are considered critical national security infrastructure by the politicians who represent the people. In the USA our politicians represent the multinational corporations and as a result we have sold the majority of our ports to Saudis, Qataris, Europeans and Chinese owners.
If Chinese ports are automated in China, they are operated by Chinese owners. If American ports are automated in the USA, they are operated by Chinese owners. It doesn’t take a genius to see the problem....
It's possible that Jay Weber will also read this information and modify his stance a bit. Weber isn't the only RadioMouth who foolishly trusts the MSM to give him all the pertinent facts.
But right now, you--dear reader--have far more facts at hand than did Jay Weber.
Use them wisely.
No comments:
Post a Comment