Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Wisconsin native. "The true soldier fights not because he hates what is in front of him, but because he loves what is behind him."--GKC "Liberalism is the modern and morbid habit of always sacrificing the normal to the abnormal" --G K Chesterton "The only objective of Liberty is Life" --G K Chesterton "A man can never have too much red wine, too many books, or too much ammunition." -- Rudyard Kipling
About Me
- Dad29
- SUPER-STRAIGHT. Old. Nasty. Likes Chesterton, Gregorian Chant and other real music. Calvin & Hobbes is Great!. Varmint-shooter, and have trained ALL my children in the art.
Fr. Harry
Followers
Gadsden
Don't Tread on Me
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(3003)
-
▼
February
(259)
- The Hermeneutic of Rupture
- More on Gamaliel, WISDOM, and JOSHUA
- Bi-Partisan = (D) Only. Yah, OK, Nancy
- Haugen/Sondheim/Webber
- Humor Break
- Who REALLY Made the Bad Mortgage Loans?
- Obama Wants New "Assault" Weapons Ban
- Hopey-Changey Health Summit: Obama Bombed
- Chisholm Has Evidence in Planned Parenthood Problem
- Statism, Described
- "Immediate Threat" to Freedom: The Feds
- To College or Not To College?
- Working Together: Liberals and Conservatives
- Swirling Deeper Into the Doylet
- By the Way, Ryan's Right, and Politico Is Wrong
- Dig the Grave for AIG
- Tales of Obama's Car Insurance and Mad Hatters
- The Genius of Big Sis' DHS
- Reinhart, Boerner, VanDuren, and ..........WHAT?
- Byrd Opposes Reconciliation Route
- Obama Admin: "Import Energy!"
- "That's What Elections Are For": Is Limbaugh Right?
- The Mentally-Challenged Greenies
- Med Malpractice/Tort Reform's Benefits
- Kohl! Feingold! Pay Attention!!
- A Decidedly Churlish Comment
- Porkulus Job-Creation? The Models Say So!
- Even CNN Has Doubts About ObamaCare V 3.0
- The Cost of Doyle, Part 454,987
- Damn Near Russia Strikes---Hard
- NCAA Self-Clownification
- DHS "Losses"
- Beware the Ides of March?
- Walking Out of Prison...
- TEA Party Manifesto
- The Democrats v. The Country
- Wisconsin Center Tax: "Forever II"
- Can You Say "Forever"?
- If Cavey Likes It, You Should, Too.
- The Second Vatican Council's Genesis
- 10 Reasons for Dropping Consumer Confidence
- Why Drug Companies Need Profits
- Feingold The Liar
- Bishop of Green Bay Raises Questions About Alinsky...
- Other Than That, Porkulus Is Just Dandy!!
- Surprise! Public Employees' Bennies Are Better!
- The Doylet Line's "Yahara Station" Alternative
- Obama Reads Eggster, Wants SocSec Tax Hike
- This "Doctor" Used Frankenstein as a Role Model
- Orwell Textbook Passage Averted in NC
- Planned Barrenhood Milwaukee: Caught on Tape
- AIG: Another Killer Zombie Arises Again
- More on Socialism from the Obama Admin
- The HuffPo/MSM "Mind". Yah, That's Repetitive
- Social Security Funds Hit the Rocks
- (D) Shows Colors: Red./Yellow/Green
- Pithy Take on ObamaCare V 3.0: It's Socialism
- You Noticed All the Gunfire?
- Baldwin, Buchen, Berry, and Moore: Same Page?
- The Bloodiest Bill: ObamaCare V 3.0
- Is GoldmanSachs Really a 'Sach' of Slime?
- ObamaCare 3.1 Will Cost $750Bn or So in New Taxes
- No, You Won't "Keep Your Health Plan"
- Is UW-Madison Breaking State Laws?
- Favre-Itis Infection
- We Really Meant "Catholic"
- He Said 'If You Elect Me the Seas Will Stop Rising'
- "Politics as Usual" or White House Bribery?
- Not Nationalized, Exactly. But "Controlled"
- DHS to Investigate White House
- This Line Says It All, Sorta
- Ron Paul?
- Breitbart: The James O'Keefe Story Is Not Over
- Another Low for ObamaSupport
- Seeking Rent for Murder
- Demonizing Tiahrt and the NRA
- Ryan: Polite Understatement
- Heard on the Street re Elmbrook Schools
- OK, Here It Is!! An Apocryphal Story for ObamaCare
- ObamaCare by Reconciliation? Bring It On!
- Thought for Lent
- For You Ladies
- Homosex Adoptions: Not Too Good
- Lunatic of Austin a TeaParty Guy? Nope.
- "........please turn off the lights....."
- "Doh! Where's My Gun"?: DHS Edition
- Porkulus Spend Goes (D), Unemployed Get Stiffed
- Bill "Blowhard" O'Reilly: "What 2A?"
- The REAL Partisans in Madistan
- Shadow Gov't Statistics' Unemployment Number
- Lay Waste to Your Fortunes: Doyle and Obama
- WallyWorld Same-Store Down. Ugh
- State Pension Funds in Trouble
- Archdiocse of DC Quits Foster Care Biz
- Another Fallout From Climate Hoax
- "Peak Oil"? Maybe Not
- The Efficacy of Porkulus: Drag Down Growth, Not M...
- The Doylet Line ChooChoo, Chapter 354
- Drat. Scalia Says "No."
- Wisconsin Leggies Will Disenfranchise Wisconsin Vo...
-
▼
February
(259)
Links
- American Economic Alert
- Boots and Sabers
- Catholic Caveman
- Catholic World News Opinion
- Chesterton & Friends
- Christus Vincit
- FreeRepublicLatestPosts
- Grim's Hall
- John Lott's Website
- Lakeshore Laments
- LawDog Files
- ManWithBlackHat
- Moonbattery
- New Liturgical Movement
- No Runny Eggs
- Other McCain
- Overlawyered
- Planet Moron
- Shark&Shepherd
- Sykes
- Terrence Berres
- The Curt Jester
- The Marquette Warrior
- The Onion: REAL News
- Vox Day
- What the Prayer REALLY Says
- Wigderson
4 comments:
The study was retracted because of errors discovered*, but no mention of which way the revamped study might point. For all we know, the corrected model may suggest HIGHER sea levels.
*That is how science is supposed to work, by the way.
So you’re saying the science is settled unless the science you believe in needs more settling?
To further Terry's point:
Slimjim, at what point should we stop analyzing the data and start acting on it? Clearly, all of these errors might affect our actions however just a few short months ago we were told to ACT IMMEDIATELY. Now that we continue to find flaws on your side of science, should we back up and start over? Or would that not be conducive to your beliefs?
For all we know, the corrected model may suggest HIGHER sea levels.
You can correct models all day long, and they will still not replicate reality. There are so many variables involved in attempting to predict *anything* involving Earth processes that the program can't be written that can take them into consideration -- biggest problem is that we don't even *know* all the factors involved, nor the extent of their effect, and any "climatologist" who tells you otherwise is lying.
Post a Comment