Friday, February 26, 2010

"That's What Elections Are For": Is Limbaugh Right?

Obamamama thinks that Harry & Nancy can jam ObamaCare V3.0 through. If that happens, Limbaugh's theory--that this President intends to create chaos for his own purposes--is 100% correct.

"If we're unable to resolve differences over health care, we will need to move ahead on decisions," he said, alluding to using reconciliation, a controversial maneuver that prevents a GOP filibuster by requiring only 51 votes to pass legislation.

Obama added that if voters are unhappy with results, then "that's what elections are for."

I think it's the first time in modern history that a President has double-dog-dared the American people to remove his own party from Congress.

But then, this is the first modern-day President whose resume begins with "Rabblerouser."

Given that it passes--still in doubt--he also knows that ObamaCare will not be repealed by the next Congress; the Rabblerouser still has a veto, after all. That leaves a large majority of Americans with a dilemma.

Those were ill-considered words.

Or, perhaps..........

1 comment:

Billiam said...

After watching that dog and pony show, I've decided that I will no longer call him The One. From now on, he is The Exaulted One, Barak the Arrogant.