Don't let them get away with the Big Lie.
The Pfizer vax is NOT "approved" by FDA; it remains an "emergency use" experimental drug.
Only the BioNTech vax is FDA approved. But that vax is not available in the USA.
Ron Johnson has the goods.
1. Why didn’t the FDA grant full licensure for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine that is in use and available in the U.S.?
2. How are the Comirnaty and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines “legally distinct” and what are the “certain differences”?
3. There is no doubt that the FDA’s action will lead to more vaccine mandates and increased pressure on those currently choosing not to get vaccinated. Your letter to Pfizer suggests that “there is not sufficient approved vaccine available for distribution.” Is there sufficient supply in the U.S. of the Comirnaty vaccine to ensure that those being vaccinated under mandates will be receiving the FDA-approved version? Or is it more likely (or certain) that they will be vaccinated using the vaccine administered under the reissued EUA?
4. If there is insufficient supply of Comirnaty vaccines for those succumbing to the coercion of mandates, isn’t the FDA de facto endorsing vaccine mandates utilizing EUA vaccines?
5. Will individuals who receive either vaccine be afforded the same legal protections if they are injured by the vaccine? If not, why not?
It is well-known that Donald Trump gave legal liability immunity to Pfizer, J&J, and Moderna. But that immunity does NOT extend to BioNTech's "Cominarity" vax.
The obvious reason that "Cominarity" is not available in the US? Trial Lawyers.
Post a Comment