This twit Hagedorn is a Friend of Scott Walker. Don't forget that. He has consistently ruled for the Government's position or interests in any major SCOWI case. Here, he rules against the US Constitution, along with the six Lefty harridans. So we have a new, very discordant band: Hagedorn and the Harridans.
But as WILL notes, the real objective is chaos, just like the '20 election.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court allowed legal challenges to the state’s congressional maps to continue forward, appointing two separate three–judge panels to hear the cases, an action that a top legal organization says violates the U.S. Constitution....
...The Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty vowed to fight the action, saying it would violate the U.S. Constitution.
“The Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty (WILL) had argued against such an appointment as any attempt to redraw the Congressional district lines in this manner would violate the U.S. Constitution,” WILL said in a news release. “These efforts also threaten to plunge Wisconsin’s election cycle into uncertainty just months before the next election season kicks off.”...
WILL rarely loses cases. It is settled SCOTUS doctrine that redistricting is a political--not a judicial--matter. Hagedorn and the Harridans disagree with SCOTUS.
The question is whether they can get away with it again. They're daring us to do something about it.....
4 comments:
He is ruling according to the Constitution and the rule of law.
And speaking about fools. This is why you don’t have emotional, Botox-addled females in key cabinet positions.
—The Justice Department said in a new court filing Tuesday that Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem made the decision to continue with deportation flights carrying migrants to a mega-prison in El Salvador, despite a federal judge’s order to turn the planes around. DOJ acknowledged in the filing that it was Noem who made the call in March to keep the planes headed to CECOT prison — after US District Judge James Boasberg last week resumed his criminal contempt inquiry to find out which Trump administration officials were responsible for flouting his orders.—
I thought Dad29 was opposed to such patent violations to the rule of law.
Let's talk about "rule of law." Bo-Ass Berg knew better than to put his patently un-Constitional "order" in writing--a fact you clearly don't want known. Bo-Ass Berg thinks that Article Two lost its force about when the Warren Court came into being. He will find out, hopefully not the hard way, that he is wrong.
Nope. He is ruling the way you'd expect from a henpecked little cuck.
Post a Comment