Thursday, April 03, 2025

NSC NeoCon Infestation Exterminated

Here's another Christmas Day!!

 President Donald J. Trump’s National Security Council was rocked by a string of firings on Thursday, just 24 hours after conservative firebrand Laura Loomer visited the Oval Office. Sources say Loomer handed Trump “research and evidence” targeting “neocons” on the Council—holdovers from the Bush-era foreign policy establishment. By the next day, multiple NSC members, possibly as many as 10, including senior directors, were out the door....

Perhaps they should learn to code.

"Wall Street Executives" vs. Trump Tariffs

In July of 2010, Angelo Codevilla fired a shot heard 'round the world, as it were.  Let's review the first couple of grafs:

As over-leveraged investment houses began to fail in September 2008, the leaders of the Republican and Democratic parties, of major corporations, and opinion leaders stretching from the National Review magazine (and the Wall Street Journal) on the right to the Nation magazine on the left, agreed that spending some $700 billion to buy the investors’ “toxic assets” was the only alternative to the U.S. economy’s “systemic collapse.” In this, President George W. Bush and his would-be Republican successor John McCain agreed with the Democratic candidate, Barack Obama. Many, if not most, people around them also agreed upon the eventual commitment of some 10 trillion nonexistent dollars in ways unprecedented in America. They explained neither the difference between the assets’ nominal and real values, nor precisely why letting the market find the latter would collapse America. The public objected immediately, by margins of three or four to one.

When this majority discovered that virtually no one in a position of power in either party or with a national voice would take their objections seriously, that decisions about their money were being made in bipartisan backroom deals with interested parties, and that the laws on these matters were being voted by people who had not read them, the term “political class” came into use. Then, after those in power changed their plans from buying toxic assets to buying up equity in banks and major industries but refused to explain why, when they reasserted their right to decide ad hoc on these and so many other matters, supposing them to be beyond the general public’s understanding, the American people started referring to those in and around government as the “ruling class.” And in fact Republican and Democratic office holders and their retinues show a similar presumption to dominate and fewer differences in tastes, habits, opinions, and sources of income among one another than between both and the rest of the country. They think, look, and act as a class....

That is NOT "ancient history."

We are told, by "Wall Street Executives" and their lapdog (camp-follower?) "experts" and press, that Trump's Tariffs will 1)  increase inflation, 2)  collapse the US economy,  and 3) create enemies worldwide.  You should be frightened, or at least skeptical, of the Trump Tariffs!!  DOOM  DOOM DOOM DOOM!!!!

Now re-read the Codevilla excerpt above.

"Wall Street Executives" have extended large loans--and/or underwritten stock and bond issues--of overseas companies and countries, mutatis mutandis.  Trump's Tariffs will negatively affect both; the countries which have to devalue their currencies and the companies which will reduce their prices.  This means that the Wall Street Executives' overseas assets are in danger.  At the very least, the assets are devalued.  At the worst, those assets will go *poof* into bankruptcy.

Now do you understand why "Wall Street Executives" are crapping all over the Trump Tariffs?

Their bonuses are threatened!  How the Hell can they keep up the payments on the yacht, the third home in the Hamptons, and the matching Mercedes convertibles?  Not to mention the maids, servants, chauffeurs, groundskeepers, and club memberships in the city and the country?

Still think those "Executives" and "experts" have your interests at heart?

 P.S.:  You could also hear what the Administration has to say, rather than reading the filtered/adjusted/partial commentary fed to you by "experts" and "executives."

Wednesday, April 02, 2025

Remnants of Fraudci Conspirators Get Fired

Well, most of them, including his "ethics minder"--his wife.  Lots of firings in the STD/AIDS group.

Others got re-assigned to Siberia, we wish various spots in HHS/FDA.

This caused the fake-news hue and cry about NIH and FDA 'losing talent and experience.'

Precisely the kind of 'talent and experience' which SHOULD be lost.  Ask anyone who watched their Mom or Granny die, alone, in a nursing home.

Gates Lies Just Like CIA--for the Same Reason!

Amusing that the decidedly anti-life Bill Gates suddenly becomes pro-life.

... Bill Gates has reportedly warned President Donald Trump's administration that his philanthropic endeavors are no replacement for the U.S. government's funding of global health care efforts.--quoted at AOSHQ

Gates is the guy who financed the insertion of depo-provera into African women's arms.

Let's go with a reality check!

... The US provides a quarter billion dollars a year to TB eradication efforts. That quarter billion represents about a quarter of total global funding for TB eradication (and by extension, 'The World" spends about a billion dollars a year on TB). Despite being a quarter of the total, US funding is the majority of funding for many countries due to how it is allocated.

The Fortune article about this doesn't mention those fairly low totals. It talks about the totals across the board - that USAID was costing about $45 billion per year, that the Gates Foundation spends about $9 billion per year, etc. - but not about TB. Not about the one thing they chose to focus on in the article. Well, we can put two and two together and find that it doesn't equal 45 billion.

TB is half a percent of USAID's outlays, and would represent less than 3% of the Gates Foundation's outlays, if it chose to focus on it. According to Newsweek, USAID was spending about $7 billion - or less that a quarter of its budget - on "health." Even assuming that "health" means what it says and is money well spent, that's less than the Gates Foundation's annual expenditure.

So it isn't about TB and it isn't about global health....

No. It IS about shoveling bushels-ful of taxpayer money into semi-fake "NGO's" which then shovel bushels-ful of money back into the pockets of *certain people* such as wives, children, nieces, nephews, and concubines of D.C. slime (a/k/a Congress critters.)

More Insanity From +"Kissy" Fernandez

Around 50 years ago, E Michael Jones posited that homosexuality often brings on insanity.  

We could re-state that, contending that constant self-reference/self-pity, typical of homosexuality, is the root of that insanity.

We don't know the 'orientation' of Cdl. Fernandez.  But there's little doubt about his insanity.

 

In a striking departure from established Church teaching, Cardinal Víctor Manuel Fernández has signaled that sex “change” surgeries may be morally acceptable under certain conditions. ...

 ...Dignitas infinita states, “[A]ny sex-change intervention, as a rule, risks threatening the unique dignity the person has received from the moment of conception.”

Rather than reiterate the document’s opposition to the legitimacy of gender mutilation surgery outright, the Prefect suggested that its morality depends on the severity of a person’s suffering. 

“When the document uses the expression ‘as a rule,’ it does not exclude the possibility that there are cases outside the norm,” Cardinal Fernández said. He referenced cases of “severe dysphoria” which might lead a person toward suicide....

"As a rule," the 5th Commandment forbids murder (and suicide), and by extension, mutilation of one's or another's body.  "As a rule" the 8th Commandment forbids slander or defamation.  "As a rule" the 9th Commandment forbids coveting another's wife.

Amazing!  NONE of them have a 'suicidal meeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!' exception.

The Direction of Things

 We've never accused Z-Man of sunny optimism.  There's a reason for that.

 

In 19th century America, it was popular to argue that there are four boxes for maintaining political liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and cartridge. There is also a version that has just three boxes, which drops the jury box from the model. The soap box is public speech used to persuade the ruling class. The ballot box is the democratic process. The jury box is the legal process, and the cartridge box is violence. The order of the boxes is important as it is both a warning and a promise....

Fast-forward to the 21st Century!

...[W]hat we see in the West [is] the use of lawfare by the managerial class to both circumvent the soap box and the ballot box. The latest example is in France, where the courts have willy-nilly decided that the most popular politician in the country is no longer allowed to participate in politics. Marine Le Pen was found guilty of trumped-up charges and sentenced to what amounts to internal banishment. Her punishment is like what happened to Khrushchev in the 1960s....

Oh, there IS another example.

 ...The most famous example of the managerial class abuse of the jury box to circumvent the soap and ballot box is Donald Trump. They tried to remove him from office in his first term, then rigged the 2020 election to deny him a second term. When he did not get the message, they used lawfare against him in the same way we see in Europe, except that Trump managed to win at the jury box. Note they reached for the cartridge box when they failed at the jury box.

The assassination of Trump is a good reminder that it is almost always the case that once either side of the political system reaches the jury box, one side or the other will reach for the cartridge box....

The 'other' side has not gotten that far, yet.

But keep attacking Teslas and Pubbie Party HQ buildings!

Keep digging......

Tuesday, April 01, 2025

Are You a Crook? Or Living With a Crook?

What you see here is the 'feminine style' of ginning up sympathy.  (Probably written by +Seitz of El Paso.)

 The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ (USCCB) Department of Migration and Refugee Services, in collaboration with the National Association of Evangelicals, World Relief, and the Center for the Study of Global Christianity at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary, has released a report entitled “One Part of the Body: The Potential Impact of Deportations on American Christian Families.” This comprehensive analysis highlights the profound impact that mass deportations could have on Christian families and congregations across the United States if carried out in the way some policymakers have proposed. The report underscores that roughly one in twelve Christians in the United States—and one in five Catholics specifically—either face the risk of deportation or live in a household with someone who does....

So.  20% of Catholics are crooks or living with a crook.  You know:  gate-crashing criminals.

That's about one-third the rate of crooked Congressmen.  Does that make you feeeeeeel better?

Even MORE Trump Christmas Day!!

 Whoa............wow........kazow...........

Ticker reports:

 ...Immigration - there are literally 1,000 indictments under 8 USC 1324 lined up.  I've been told this.  As soon as the tariffs bite and firms try to lay people off he's going to hammer all the employers of illegals.  They'll have two choices: Hire the Americans being laid off or go out of business.  This is coming within the next month.

Medical - there are another 1,000 indictments under 15 USC Chapter 1 in the pipe.  That's next into the late spring and summer, and will force down medical costs by 80%.  That, in turn, will cut 15% off the operating cost for every US-based business which is utterly huge...

There's more at the link.

Pretty clear that Trump didn't spend those four years in the wilderness just playing golf

N.B.:  It's also April Fool's Day...........so take all that with a grain of salt...........

Twenty-One Lying Republicans

These are Republicans who lied in the very first graf of their letter.  That makes them Democrat wannabees.  

As Members of the House Republican Conference, we write to emphasize the importance of prioritizing energy affordability for American families and keeping on our current path to energy dominance amid efforts to repeal or reform current energy tax credits....

Their worship of Mammon the green goddess has cost Wisconsin Electric customers a ~30% increase in their electricity bills over the last 5 years.  That's the direct opposite of "energy affordability."  But then, these are wannabee Democrats.

(One of them--from Nebraska--is also a warmonger who competes with Senator Cotton for the WarMonger of the Year title, every year.)

These people are disgusting.  They want you to believe they 'emphasize energy affordability' while demanding the exact opposite:  more windmills and sun-catchers and battery fields.

This is why members of Congress earn all the spit that their constituents throw at them, and they are damned lucky that spit is all that's thrown.