To the surprise of nobody with an IQ above room temperature....
...The problem for Democrats is that the late-night drop of an improbable 108,000 absentee ballots that were nearly all for the Democratic candidate fitted an all-too-recognizable pattern of election fraud made possible by cryptographic algorithms embedded covertly in the official State Board of Elections (SBOE) voter registration database. Unfortunately for the Democrats, Andrew Paquette, Ph.D., had previously found an illegal clandestine algorithm in the SBOE voter rolls....
Get your fainting-couch ready for the next line:
Paquette has also discovered similar illegal cryptographic algorithms in New York, Ohio, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Arizona,
... the algorithms are an intelligence-grade-complexity mathematical scheme that facilitates creating and hiding false voters who receive legitimate state voter IDs. After making the false voter records, the criminals responsible for embedding the algorithm in the database can hide the false records so that they can be recovered by an algorithm locator number known only to the criminals. The criminals’ favorite targets for creating duplicate clone voter records are inactive voters, deceased voters, and voters who have moved out of the state....
You all recall that the Elections Board refused to clean the voter rolls, claiming that it is the responsibility of the locals.
Of course.
... By creating duplicate “clones” of these records, the criminals have exploited a voter record that should have been purged to produce a second “nonexistent” voter registration duplicate that can be double-voted in mail-in ballot schemes that are difficult to detect. State officials turning a blind eye to the late dropping of thousands of mail-in votes favorable to Democrats strive to block forensic examination of the mail-in ballots that almost certainly would have detected the fraud by identifying mail-in ballots that were never mailed, signatures on mail-in ballots that do not match signatures on registration cards, failure to date mail-in ballots properly, and in community canvassing to see if qualified registered voters live at the addresses to which the fraudulent mail-in ballots were supposed to have been mailed....
Not to mention a close examination for "signature matches" on mail-in/absentee ballots.
About 1/3 of the State voters' database match clone voter records.
It's interesting. Naturally, "news" outlets in Wisconsin have never asked to review ballot envelopes for signature-match and date-matches. And nobody has canvassed a neighborhood to check on "voters" living at the mail-to addresses.
