Not only Julia, but Mommy-Judge ACB.
...“Literally in the middle of the night, the Court issued unprecedented and legally questionable relief without giving the lower courts a chance to rule, without hearing from the opposing party, within eight hours of receiving the application, with dubious factual support for its order, and without providing any explanation for its order,” Alito wrote in his opinion.
“I refused to join the Court’s order because we had no good reason to think that, under the circumstances, issuing an order at midnight was necessary or appropriate. Both the Executive and the Judiciary have an obligation to follow the law. The Executive must proceed under the terms of our order in Trumpv. J.G.G., 604 U. S. (2025) (per curiam), and this Court should follow established procedures.”
According to Alito, the Supreme Court only had jurisdiction if the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals had jurisdiction first. And the Fifth Circuit could only act if the order appealed from was a denial of a preliminary injunction—not a temporary restraining order (TRO).
Alito made it clear that the far-left groups like the ACLU were manipulating the process by prematurely appealing something that wasn’t even formally denied. The High Court, according to Alito, took the bait—something he says violates precedent and basic legal procedure.
The emergency request did not stem from a real, appealable decision. Instead, the ACLU argued the district court had constructively denied a request by not acting fast enough.
“This Court had jurisdiction only if the Court of Appeals had jurisdiction of the applicants’ appeal, and the Court of Appeals had jurisdiction only if the supposed order that the applicants appealed amounted to the denial of a preliminary injunction,” Alito wrote....
That "Constitutional Crisis" coming soon is caused by SCOTUS and its inferior Courts.
As Sundance put it, "Join a Gang! You Have More Rights!!"
We don't think Julia knows what he's asking for.
3 comments:
That's not going to be easy for the cops, and they know it. And yes, Julia and Bleeding-Heart MommyJudge can go straight to Hell.
Thanks Justice Roberts for this illegal piece of shit: Your enabling this shit.
….HORRIFIC: Raymundo Juan Reyes Cornelio, was arrested and admitted to r*ping and impregnating an 11-YEAR-OLD CHILD. The girl then gave birth at 12 years old.
Conrelio is being held on a $75,000 bond and has an ICE detainer hold.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/04/illegal-alien-arrested-tennessee-after-impregnating-11-year/
Try to pay close attention, Dad29.
Only a declaration of war by Congress can justify the use of the Alien act. Yet, no declared war is taking place today.
Now, if we take a textualism approach in statutory interpretation and an originalism approach in constitutional interpretation as advocated by the late Antonin Scalia, and as championed by Alito and Thomas, Trump has a high wall to climb and get over.
He must make good on the claim the act applies by producing specific evidence that the deported individuals in question were sent by another government with the intent to perpetrate a “hostile entrance, attack, or assault”. In other words, Trump would have to show that TdA is effectively acting on behalf of a foreign government. Yet it appears that DofJ lawyers admitted in court filings the direction is “clandestine” by TdA itself and not linked directly to Venezuela.
This is a high evidentiary standard that even Scalia and Thomas would agree must be met, given their judicial philosophy. Otherwise, if they deviate, they are hypocrites.
Then again, since there has been no declaration of war by Congress, it would appear that the point is moot.—
Remember, on March 27, 2024...
—D.C. Circuit court ruled today against the administration. If SCOTUS, lets it stand, that will set the precedent (against using the alien enemy act for deporting without due process).
Appeals court sides with judge who blocked deportations under wartime authority
https://www.npr.org/2025/03/26/g-s1-56392/appeals-circuit-alien-enemies-act
Government also suffered a setback deporting a South Korean national without due process.
Judge temporarily blocks Trump admin from deporting South Korean Columbia student
https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5213841-judge-blocks-columbia-student-deportation/--
"Once the Trump administration attempts to revoke a visa or green card – which grants permanent residency rather than a short-term stay in the US for a specific purpose — students still have the right to an immigration hearing to determine if their deportations are justified, according to Cheryl David, a New York immigration attorney.
The level of due process that they may be entitled to will depend on what immigration status they have in the United States, and whether or not the Trump administration has a basis for revoking their lawful status in the United States that has any reasonable basis in law or not,” said Elora Mukherjee, a professor at Columbia Law School and director of its Immigrants’ Rights Clinic.
To repeat, TdA is NOT a nation or a foreign government, nor is part of the Venezuelan government, nor has Venezuela or TdA invaded or threatened to invade our nation. The act has only been a power invoked THREE TIMES IN WARTIME. So far, the courts in their proper and legitimate function–despite your virtue signaling–have ruled it cannot used against nationals of a country—Venezuela—with whom the United States is not at war, which is not invading the United States, and which has not launched a predatory incursion into the United States.
George Fishman, who worked for Trump in his first administration in Homeland Security, said that the law could not be applied here since “I don’t think their actions can be attributed to those governments. And even if they could, then the question comes up of whether mass illegal immigration constitutes an invasion. That argument has been made … but no federal court has yet accepted it. So that would be another hurdle”.
Thus, the courts in their proper role (checks and balances!) have indicated it is a patently bad faith move for the executive branch to unilaterally say that migration is an invasion, or that non-state actors are foreign governments, and thus must be automatically removed without a hearing.
Post a Comment