There are a number of people who think that the Bush War in Iraq was ill-advised. Reason: taking out Saddam, while a good thing, triggered a much larger bad thing: the demolition of order in Iraq. Yes, Saddam's "order" was dystopian--but he kept a lid on Muslim fanatics.
Such as ISIS, for example.
Now we have Obozo. After a successful campaign partly founded on Bush-bashing over the war, what is this character doing?
Trying to take out another Middle Eastern dystopia.
And guess what the results have been?
An even more virulent and strong ISIS (which the US armed through its CIA), and a resurgence of Iranian Muslim fanaticism.
But there's more: remember that Obozo also toppled the government of Egypt, which resulted in another period of riots and destruction until the Egyptian army had had enough of that, dumping the Muslim-fanatic government and restoring order.
So. Is Obozo just stupid? Or is he a committed revolutionary, dedicated to overturning order anywhere he can make it happen?
If you're having trouble answering that question, you are exactly what Obozo needed to get elected.
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Post a Comment