Arguing the con, McCarthy.
....It is not just that the intensely unpopular Obamacare was
unconstitutional as fraudulently portrayed by the president and
congressional Democrats who strong-armed and pot-sweetened its way to
passage. It is that Obamacare is unconstitutional as rewritten by
Roberts. It is a violation of the Origination Clause — not only as I
have expansively construed it, but even under Matt’s narrow
interpretation of the Clause....
You'll have to read the essay yourselves. McCarthy argues that the process of passage was un-Constitutional AND that SCOTUS stepped out of its bounds to canonize the "law."
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Post a Comment