An ex-Fed prosecutor sets the record straight on the Durham Annex' mentions of "Bernardo emails" and the "Clinton plan." Note: "DSI" is "Dutch Special Intelligence"--who had forwarded intercepted Russian spy docs to the FEEBS, at that time run by a bunch of Quisling Crooks.
...While much of the legacy media has either ignored the release of the Annex, or attempted to pour cold water on it by claiming that Durham found the “Bernardo Emails” — identifying the “Clinton Plan” — to be “fake”, that is not what Durham says.
Durham states that it was his “best assessment” that the “emails” were in fact composites with information coming from more than one source. The question then is whether all the information or some of the information is objectively false, having been invented by Russian intelligence. The legacy media wants that to be the public’s conclusion.
But that wasn’t the question that Durham set out to answer. Durham’s inquiry was as follows:
Why did the FBI react as it did to information from a single meeting in a London bar between an Australian diplomat and a Trump campaign “official” no one ever heard of — information that was nearly two months old — while doing literally NOTHING in response to the DSI received over a period of months, which was specific as to individuals, plans, actions, etc.
The FBI has never provided any explanation for doing NOTHING — literally NOTHING — after receiving information that Crossfire Hurricane may, in fact, be a downstream consequence of false information injected into US intelligence and law enforcement by the Clinton Campaign.
As Durham’s Annex makes clear, when the Crossfire Hurricane analysts were first briefed on the content of the July DSI, and when they first saw the actual text of the DSI, no follow up was planned and no taskings were given.
The FBI did NOTHING....
Did I say "Quisling Crooks"?
Yes. Yes, I did.
No comments:
Post a Comment