Old Fool Pushing Hard for (Nuclear?) War. Why?

 There's a reason for this.

...the U.S. is moving troops from the 101st Airborne ‘screaming eagles’ into NATO allied countries on the western border of Ukraine.   This is the first deployment of the Army’s 101st Airborne Division from Fort Campbell, Kentucky, to Europe in 80 years.  As noted by base reporting, “Elements of 2nd Brigade Combat Team, and 101st Headquarters and Headquarters Battalion, 101st Airborne Division, have been assigned to carry out the mission.”...

Also:

 ...Biden has announced that six U.S. Navy Arleigh Burke-class destroyers are being moved into the Mediterranean Sea to provide air defense missions and the ability to launch cruise missiles well inland into Russia...

And:

... Joe Biden is sending “two additional F-35 squadrons to the UK, and station additional air defense and other capabilities in Germany and in Italy.”...

As Last Refuge notes, none of this is defensive.  It is all offensive.

The reason?

War is very good for incumbent Presidents.  Historically, the electorate has retained Presidents during war.

And Biden has not finished demolishing the United States.  He will need a second term during which he can finish reducing the population to utter poverty, prevent them from driving and heating and cooling their homes, and jail dissidents, no trial needed.

That's why.

Further reading:  The Russki perspective, including the prediction that the war will get intense in (you guessed it) 2024--an election year.  Whether it's about global hegemony, or only about WEF's "Great Reset," is irrelevant--if the nukes are flying.

UPDATE:  Wauck is not terribly worried.