The "Russia Russia Russia" election bullshit from Hillary remains active in the courts.
A Clinton-appointed judge tossed out a lawsuit in which a woman was (in effect) called a whore-for-Russia--and that she had 'left a conference' in the company of Gen. Mike Flynn.
She sued Stefan Halper (the REAL whore in this case) for his defamatory statement.
The judge tossed out the lawsuit. That dismissal was appealed. The Fourth Circuit had something to say about the Clinton judge:
..."We conclude that the court could not have properly concluded that Lokhova's complaint ... had absolutely no chance of success," the appeals court ruled in April in a unanimous 3-0 decision that reversed Brinkema's dismissal of the case and her order of a penalty against Lokhova for filing an allegedly frivolous lawsuit.
"We conclude that the district court abused its discretion in finding Lokhova's complaint frivolous and concluding on that basis that its filing violated Rule 11," the appeals court ruled. "The judgment of the district court — as reflected in its orders of May 5, 2021 and July 9, 2021 — is therefore reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings."...
That was a unanimous ruling.
Now why, oh why, would a Clinton judge dismiss a case against a Clinton whore (Halper) in a case which could expose the whole Clinton sedition scheme?
Just askin'......
No comments:
Post a Comment