The Warmonger/Deep State Party would prefer that you do not know this history.
...the Russians in the Donbas were systematically persecuted and, in fact, cannonaded. Following the usual Anglo-Saxon pattern, NATO decided that they would force Russia to act, and then call them invaders. Around the 19 February, THE Ukraine began to shoot 2000 shells a day against the civilians in the Donbas, up from 20. Clearly, they wanted Russia to go in...
This is how NATO (read: the US Empire, following British instructions) does it.
...Russia reacted as it was clear it would. It recognised, by act of Parliament, Donetsk and Lugansk as independent Republics. Then they received the latter’s formal request for military help. Then they – again, by act of Parliament – authorised the Russian Government to intervene. This was the same pattern used by NATO to attack Serbia in, if memory serves, 1999....
What? You don't remember reading about that 2,000 shells/day bombardment of White Russians in Ukraine?
Gee.
2 comments:
The Warmonger Nuland on Ukraine:
"We have to remember that the bulk of this money is going right back into the U.S. to make those weapons."
Everything is about money laundering.
That money does not end up in the US, but goes from the US budget to the accounts of the shareholders in the weapons manufacturing factories.
Only about 10% go to factory workers.
Listen to the Video
https://meaninginhistory.substack.com/p/ukrainian-lives-got-wholesale
Don't be silly with your "who benefits" breakdown. There are a lot of industries (mostly in the US) who get a piece of that slobbering pie. All those weapons have components which are most often built in several more US factories.
So yes, shareholders get about 5-10%, upper management gets 5-10%, and labor and materials get the rest. Your 401k happens to be a shareholder.
It's not a question of the MIL. It's a question of WHY?
They can't give you a good reason, so they use theirs: MONEY.
Post a Comment