Biden* showed up yesterday to ululate over "Covid" (read: Chinese Communist bio-weapon) deaths, now said to be 500K in the US.
But neither Biden nor anyone else knows with certainty how many the ChiComs have killed through that weapon.
You DID notice that Asian Flu A and B "disappeared" this season?
Well, how about this:
July 16, 2020, podcast, “This Week In Virology” : Tony Fauci makes a point of saying the PCR COVID test is useless and misleading when the test is run at “35 cycles or higher.” A positive result, indicating infection, cannot be accepted or believed. “…If you get [perform the test at] a cycle threshold of 35 or more…the chances of it being replication-competent [aka accurate] are miniscule…you almost never can culture virus [detect a true positive result] from a 37 threshold cycle…even 36…”
Yah, we heard that.
So "Covid deaths" may not be "Covid" deaths. They could be simple pneumonia, old age, complications of obesity, Flu A or -B, or high blood pressure.
But "COVID KILLS!!! RUN!!! HIDE!!! TAKE EXPERIMENTAL SHOTS!!!! is exactly the backdrop a Totalitarian wants.
So you'll hear more of that Bee Ess.
The taxonomy of a COVID-19 death was begin long before this Fauci tripe. The WHO published documents showing how to "move" a positive up on a death certificate to make it into a "cause of death," From this has come the obvious distinction between dying "from" as to dying "with" a positive marker. The CDC specifically also has noted that about 6 percent of the massive numbers of deaths "cheered" in the press are ONLY from the virus, which spawned the term, co-morbidity" and the CDC's own admission that patients died with an average of "2.6" other morbidities. But the illogic of this is great. A patient who could have survived for years with a morbidity -- as happens very often -- before succumbing, is now deemed with words like "probable" and "presumed" to be a COVID death. This is funny games with taxonomy. The other conclusions are that this is unethical, or criminal. I think the later is the workable conclusion. Too much money is at stake for the very few.
Post a Comment