As usual, Sundance presents food for thought.
... The Senate version of the previously passed Big Beautiful Bill cuts more spending than originally delivered from the House. You might ask why then did spending opposition narratives surface now and not when it passed through the House? Good question, we’ll get to that ‘political answer’ in a moment....
...The original plan was always to use rescission bills to cut out the DOGE waste. Per Senate rules, the rescissions/cuts cannot be done until after the initial funding bill is passed (that’s BBB). Timeline: July – BBB, Aug – Rescission bills to cut DOGE waste {examples}, and Sept – FY 2026 Budget bill which begins October 1st....
Oh. Well, that signifies a Failure In Messaging from the White House. Look all you like; there is no "conservative" site which mentions that timeline.
Here comes the fun part!
...The declared “spending opposition” to the bill is actually a cover narrative for those who demand expanded immigration (Wall Street) and stand against border control and deportation....
They are angry about the immigration enforcement aspect but must remain quiet about it because so many Americans support the border security part. So, the CONservatives and Tech bros attack based on spending, but that’s really just a Mick “Cantaloupes” Mulvaney maneuver.
In addition to destroying the “Green New Deal” fiasco, the Big Beautiful Bill gives $70 billion to President Trump to secure the border and get rid of criminal illegal aliens. The border security money is needed to exit the illegal aliens who Obama/Biden imported. Money for more ICE agents and repatriation flight costs....
Also un-mentioned: new H-1B limits. This is a HUGE problem for the TechBro "Capitalists" (who are really wage-arbitrage pirates.)
Finally, a short video exposing a few of the CBO's 'We Didn't Count This' fallacies.
All in all? A pretty good start despite Abominable Messaging Failures from the Administration.
No comments:
Post a Comment