Ahhh, the agenda of Da Press. Here you'll see how a "reporter" attacks both an insignificant change in Wisconsin law AND the Left's most-hated Wisconsin legislator. The latter is the real reason for the story, folks.
...Rep. Andre Jacque (R-De Pere) is putting the finishing touches on a bill
that would remove woodchucks from Wisconsin's protected species list
and allow people to kill an unlimited number of woodchucks during a
season that would run nearly year-round. Jacque said woodchucks don't
serve protected status because they're abundant and a nuisance...
"There really isn't a good justification for why woodchucks are on the
protected list," Jacque said. "(The season) is more to control a
nuisance. I can imagine they can certainly do some damage."...
Jacque is right. The damn things are eating machines, their population is huge, and they are a nuisance.
But that's irrelevant to the "reporter" who is on the mission!!
The bill represents another expansion of hunting rights in Wisconsin and
promises to reignite a years-old debate over whether hunters really
need another target species.
"...hunters NEED"? Really? The question is control of a pest, not "needs" of hunters.
The "reporter"'s game, however, has little to do with "hunters", "needs", or pest-control. It has to do with Jacque, who happens to be the Number One anti-abortion legislator in the State of Wisconsin.
That means Jacque must be taken down, no matter the method. Anything he does will be fair game.
This begs the question: does Wisconsin "need" agitprop reporters?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
So people don't "need" to protect their property from a species that can do a lot of damage.
Once again, the left shows its priorities are anything environmental before people.
Such reporters are also useless, over abundant "eating machines"
That suggest a parallel solution.
Most left wing bloggers are, too.
Fucking Zach Wisniewski must be pushing three bills now.
Post a Comment