He intends to crush tens of thousands of Wisconsin churches, church-goers, workers and families--and their businesses. There's no other way to read this "order."
...the state Department of Health Services will determine when it is appropriate to progress to each of three phases of reopening. In addition to seeing a 14-day decline in positive cases as a percentage of total tested, there must also be progress in increasing testing; tracing those who are infected; tracking the pandemic; acquiring personal protective equipment for health care and public safety agencies; and ensuring health care facilities have capacity for a surge....First: the Governor, not some Abortion-Barbie headed bureaucracy, should "determine" progress, although one expects the Governor to take advice from them.
Second: At this time, Wisconsin's testing shows only 10% positive results--which is below the national average of 20% (per London Daily Mail 4/20/20). How much "less" can Wisconsin's rate become?
Third: What is "progress in increasing testing"? An extra 50/day? 100/day? 2,000/day?
Fourth: Abortion-Barbie Palm wants to hire 1,000 new Chinese Communist Party Virus (CCP-V) 'chasers' to track and trace infections. Oh? Does that mean she will keep the State's churches and commerce closed down tight until she finds 1,000 people for this? (By the way, how will they "qualify" for that job? How long can "hiring" all those "qualified" people take?)
Fifth: Will anyone define "acquiring PPE for PSA and HC"? One set of PPE/person? Five sets? Two hundred fifty sets?
Finally: Don't you love that "surge" bullshit, especially when there was never a danger of a shortage of hospital rooms in the first place?
The "plan" is NOT to re-open Wisconsin's churches and businesses. There's an election at stake here--and what's more important: you miserable churchgoing Deplorables, or a (D) in the White House?
P.S.: Plenty more observations from Owen.
1 comment:
A better name may be The Act 10 Payback Plan.
Isn't Andrea Palm the same person who decided that Wisconsin was in the bag for Hillary in 2016 and decided to campaign elsewhere? Not too good with mathematical analysis and risk evaluation, eh?
Post a Comment