In that letter, Wanggard asks a number of questions, NONE of which Evers will answer clearly, even though Evers claims that "the science" is behind his extension.
Samples:
When putting in place your order for the initial four weeks, it was explained that this time period was chosen for the purpose of preventing the disease’s spread for two, 2-week, incubation periods. What in the science of the disease has changed that now recommends four-and-a-half, 2-week, incubation periods?...
...How many people have required hospitalization specifically for COVID-19 and not underlying health conditions and how many have required treatment in ICUs or with ventilators? What is the current (as of the day of your response) number of people a) hospitalized, b) in ICU, and c) on ventilators in Wisconsin? What percentage ofWisconsin’s health care capacity does that represent?...
...You have extended “Safer at Home” until May 26, 2020. What evidence do you have that a 9-week quarantine order will decrease the infection and death rate from COVID-19?...
There are plenty more excellent questions at the link. We won't hold our breath waiting for answers.
No comments:
Post a Comment