Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Wisconsin native. "The true soldier fights not because he hates what is in front of him, but because he loves what is behind him."--GKC "Liberalism is the modern and morbid habit of always sacrificing the normal to the abnormal" --G K Chesterton "The only objective of Liberty is Life" --G K Chesterton "A man can never have too much red wine, too many books, or too much ammunition." -- Rudyard Kipling
11 comments:
Well, you know, reading the law literally and all that.
That's your opinion.
Others disagree, for good reason.
Sounds more like you had your mind made up before she released her decision. You've read it, understood it, and already formed an opinion? What part of the open meetings law would you like to see struck by some activist judge?
Someone once told me--your side lost, the adults won, so get over it, and move on.
Besids, Scalia and Thomas would be proud of Sumi's decision of interpreting the law to its letter.
Oh, those who disagree (like your hero Esenberg) have been thoroughly thrashed lock, stock, and barrel. One only needs to go to his website to learn how even novices and experts put his arguments to shame.
Wow, the GOP Teapot Revolution sure blew up in a hurry.
Wah wah wah.
Pass it in the 2011-2013 Budget. Or appeal it to the SCOWI. Either way, we will win.
Umm, John, Sumi had her mind made up before she even heard any arguments.
This is the judge that said kids missing school is no big deal and refused to order Madison teachers back to work during their illegal strike.
Clearly, she is not very intelligent but also a liberal hack and union thug.
Besides, why issue this ruling when the WI. Supremes will hear this case in about 2 weeks? Oh wait, she wants to impress her supporters and needs her 15 seconds of fame.
I think she went to the same schools as Kloppenberg and both schools failed to teach them common sense and the law.
Dan and Disgruntled--Hogwash. She interpreted the letter of the law. Scalia and Thomas would be proud. If the Wisconsin Supreme Court overturns her ruling on the basis that the Open Records Law is unconstitutional, then they would be employing judicial activism. Why? Because the conservative judges who sit on the bench would be turning their backs on their own ideology.
Get around the fact that this site "offends conservative sensibilities". That is code for "Damn, he's right, but I dare not admit it."
illusorytenant.blogspot.com/2011_05_01_archive.html
illusorytenant.blogspot.com/2011/03/meeting-held-within-120-minutes-three.html
It's too bad that Patrick has his partisan blinders on yet one more time.
Clear, concise analysis.
illusorytenant.blogspot.com/search?q=Open+Meetings+Law
illusorytenant.blogspot.com/2011/03/law-profs-wing-nuts-gone-noticeably.html
llusorytenant.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2011-04-25T22%3A41%3A00-05%3A00&max-results=50
Foley's analysis is wrong.
But lengthy!
Why is it wrong, Dad29?
Because it does not adhere to dad's twisted world view. The tea party was fun while it lasted.
Post a Comment