The predictable screeching and bi-sexual hysteria continues to ramp up over the Indiana law; even somewhat sophisticated observers have...skewed....thoughts on it.
So what does it actually say?
[That] government entities in the state “may substantially burden a person’s
exercise of religion” only “in the furtherance of a compelling
government interest[]” and using “the least restrictive means of
furthering that compelling government interest.”...
Yah, that's radical anti-whatever language. /sarcasm
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment