In which case, she's on the wrong side.
The new (hospital-announced) MACT rules are a very serious danger to this country.
...The Associated Press estimated that “more than 32 mostly coal-fired power plants in a dozen states will be forced to close because of the new, more stringent regulations. Another 36 plants are at risk of closing.” This will drain at least 14.7 gigawatts, “enough power for more than 11 million households,” off the grid between 2014 and 2015.
The AP nevertheless assures us that “no lights will go dark,” which sounds less like a prediction than a prayer. How do we lose 14.7 gigawatts without any lights going dark?
By the way, there is ZERO evidence that utility-emitted mercury has any health effects. ZERO. One may speculate that there are some, of course. But 28 gigawatts is a helluva large bet on speculation. (Of course, our Statist Masters will not have to worry about electricity shortages.)
You remember those images of North Korea at night?
Yup.
1 comment:
I'm inclined to believe the NAERC number, as they are non -partisan and the only dog they have in this fight is keeping the lights on.
The new-new boiler MACT is only slightly less bad than the old-new boiler MACT and, I believe also includes boilers fired by fuels other than coal (i.e., NG, oil, waste fuels). The administrative burden is huge as well.
Remember "necessarily skyrocket" and "bankrupt".
Post a Comment