"Interpret the Law As Understood When Written"??

Egads.

In a startling 180-degree turn from its usual Progressive Sacred Mantra, the Wisconsin Broadcasters and Wisconsin Newspapers demand that:

...the court should interpret the meaning of "prevail" as it was understood by the Wisconsin lawmakers who adopted it in 1982, "not what the U.S. Supreme Court held nearly twenty years later," in a case about the federal records law....

Does this mean that the meaning of the Constitution--and the Second Amendment--should be interpreted as it was understood by the Framers, not what Our Progressive Betters would prefer 200++ years later?

Nah.  Can't be.