Ticker, who is a very savvy computer guy, addresses the story of the DNC 'hack.' The story he writes about is the one which proposes--credibly--that the machine was 'hacked' by an insider who downloaded the documents to a USB drive or SD card.
That's not the interesting part.
The interesting part is here:
...Left unsaid in the linked article, but it shouldn't have been, is
that if there was an SD card or external USB device plugged into the
machine there is an event log from said machine documenting
the exact time that said device was attached and detached. Find that
log (or the timestamp on it being erased, which is equally good in a
situation like this), match it against the metadata times, and then
start looking for security camera footage and/or access card logs for
where that machine is and you know who did it with near-certainty, proved by the forensic evidence.
Now perhaps you can explain why the FBI didn't raid the
DNC's offices with a warrant, take custody of said logs and go through
them to perform this investigation -- which would have pointed straight
at the party or parties responsible.....
Now you also know why the DNC did not voluntarily give up their machines for examination, eh? Maybe the DNC already knew that Seth Rich did it, and already took their revenge??
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Post a Comment