Hot Air caught this one.
TEA Party catnip.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Wisconsin native. "The true soldier fights not because he hates what is in front of him, but because he loves what is behind him."--GKC "Liberalism is the modern and morbid habit of always sacrificing the normal to the abnormal" --G K Chesterton "The only objective of Liberty is Life" --G K Chesterton "A man can never have too much red wine, too many books, or too much ammunition." -- Rudyard Kipling
About Me
- Dad29
- SUPER-STRAIGHT. Old. Nasty. Likes Chesterton, Gregorian Chant and other real music. Calvin & Hobbes is Great!. Varmint-shooter, and have trained ALL my children in the art.
Fr. Harry
Followers
Gadsden
Don't Tread on Me
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(3003)
-
▼
October
(247)
- Like Electricity? Don't Bet on Keeping It
- "Don't Even THINK About It": SEIU to MPS
- Maquiladora Shooting: A New Issue for US Firms?
- New Foreclosure News
- REAL Regulatory Reform
- Regulatory Cost Escalation: OSHA
- Personal Income Data Is UGLY
- GDP Pop? Yes, in Warehouses
- Surprise! LeftOWacky Assaults (R) Supporter
- Title Insurers Decide to Insure REO Titles
- Nanny Overlord Witkowiak
- Yank the Pentagon's Chain, Hard
- NFL's PAC Gave $5K to Feingold
- Will Congress Stop Corn-A-Holing You?
- Kerry Gets It (Partly) Right
- Budget Cuts? Here's Another One!
- Just Who Do These People Think They Are?
- On Feingold's Planet, There are Three Moons, Too
- The TEA Party's Mirror-Image: HillBuzz
- Hmmnpf. I Told You So!
- Moral Hazards From Nanny Government
- On Voting for Catholics
- Politics? Culture?
- Context Counts
- How Many Jobs Did You Hold?
- "Send a Little More Money and I'll Change My Mind.."
- The Bought-and-Paid-For Party? (D)
- Nastiness in Politics
- Did TARP Actually Return Profits?
- "Entuhsiasm Gap"? WHAT "Enthusiasm"?
- The Rest of the Story on the Rand Paul Stalker
- The Milwaukee "Catholic" Herald?
- A Warning for Ron Johnson, Ribble, and Duffy
- The Allegory: Financial Collapse
- Vote GAY!!
- Barnum & Bailey's 9th Circus Rolls On
- Going Anti-Catholic: (D) Payback for Defending Ma...
- Heeding Sykes' Call
- Where's SNAP Now?
- Vegas Cop-Shop Signals Corruption
- BK the School Districts?
- Trial Lawyers Prefer Botulism
- Here's Another $400 Million/Year the Feds Waste
- Law Enforcement?
- The Problem With Banks
- UW-Madison Catholic Center
- Who Needs IBM?
- TARP: Still a Loser
- Not "Warming", Not "Change": Now "Disruption"
- Windy Tomorrow? Think "Edmund Fitzgerald Windy"
- Keynes "Monetize" Policy Has Consequences UPDATED
- Obama/Geithner Lying? Yup.
- A Couple of Points About "Incivility"
- Converting the Bears
- How Government Works
- And In 10th Place: National Security
- Proud Member of the Constitution Cult!
- The Big Dog Money in the Elections? AFSCME
- Well, Now I KNOW How to Vote
- Vote for Ralph Feinberg, (D-WI)!!!
- Single Payer? You Betcha!!
- John Drew, Ph.D., on Classmate Obama
- "Meet the Depressed (And Totally Stupid)"
- Obama's Conveniently Truncated Lincoln Quote
- One Helluva Visit to Bombay, Mr. President!
- Michelle Obama, Jackson-Lee: Electioneering Is Bi...
- The Prophetic Onion
- The Bugs
- Defense Budget Cuts? Here's One
- Who Spent More Than the Chamber of Commerce?
- Shari'a Has A Redeeming Feature
- Walker Pander Creates Lefty Bash-Opportunity
- (R) Establishment Biting the Green....Weenie...
- Katharine McPhee
- The Other Way to Look at Obama's Job Record
- SEIU "Finds" 6,000 Fake Voters in CO
- Yup. Holder's Dept of Justice is Racist
- The 'Underwater' Party Grows
- Germany Dumps Keynes, Recovers Fast
- SEIU "Finds" 3K New Voters. 1.8K Are Not Real
- Bruce Murphy Discovers the Party of Government
- Jay's A Day Late and ~$1.99 Million Short
- Really Good Ad
- Obama NLRB Resurrects the Secondary Boycott
- Corker, McConnell Playing Word-Games, Again
- JS Reporter Overworked?
- Nanny Public Radio (NPR) Fires Williams
- The Walker Agenda, Part 1,958
- About That "Cost" of ObamaCare? Look UP!!
- UFCW Shafted by ObamaCare
- Bloomberg Headline Is BS
- What O'Donnell ACTUALLY Said to the Bearded Commie
- Two Plus Two = (R) Victories
- John Paul II and the Welfare State
- Why Kurtz, McConnell, and the Establishment Media ...
- Anti-Frank Commercial
- Atheism Denuded
- Toll Roads
- Feingold's Doctor
- Coons Has Problems with the First Amendment
-
▼
October
(247)
Links
- American Economic Alert
- Boots and Sabers
- Catholic Caveman
- Catholic World News Opinion
- Chesterton & Friends
- Christus Vincit
- FreeRepublicLatestPosts
- Grim's Hall
- John Lott's Website
- Lakeshore Laments
- LawDog Files
- ManWithBlackHat
- Moonbattery
- New Liturgical Movement
- No Runny Eggs
- Other McCain
- Overlawyered
- Planet Moron
- Shark&Shepherd
- Sykes
- Terrence Berres
- The Curt Jester
- The Marquette Warrior
- The Onion: REAL News
- Vox Day
- What the Prayer REALLY Says
- Wigderson
15 comments:
Yes, what a brilliant piece of political commentary. Here are some of the cogent rebuttals...
China owns 6% of the U.S. public debt. That's a fact, easily accessible in Treasury records (which are updated daily, by law). The whole "China subsidizes US spending" meme is just political fear mongering from both the right and the left. 75% of the public debt is actually owned by US financial companies, banks, and private investors. The other 19% of the debt is owned by Japan, the UK, private non-US banks, Brazil, Hong Kong, and Russia. Get your facts straight.
China put 4 trillion Yuan ($586B) into stimulus in 2008. Way, way, way bigger than ours relative to the size of the economy. Unlike here, all of it went to infrastructure, rather than primarily into wasteful tax cuts. As a result, their economy grew by 7.3% last year.
This is stupid on so many levels.
China would never blame a nation's downfall on State interventionsim, when their own economy (which is, mind it, going pretty well) is based on it.
Turning their backs on the principles that made them great? COME ON! The world's dynamics change continuously, it's only normal that a country has to modify its principles in order to adapt. It's not because USA's economy depended on slavery that it had to stay that way.
[and, my personal favorite...]
开始学中文吧， 你们肥胖的美国母狗
Uh-huh. And Bloomberg reports (yesterday) that PRC inflation is near out-of-control due to their "stimulus".
And PRC's economy depends on mercantile semi-slavery, just like it always had. Think they'll change?
Anon, just because you put it in Chinese characters does not mean you should cuss on someone's blog.
Hey, anon 6:57 a.m., the Chinese characters was a JOKE! Unless you know for sure that it is a profanity. Why don't you enlighten us???
Its roughly translated to "Better learn Chinese Bit#@". The last word is the English word for a female dog.
The only question is why would someone post a phrase from another language which, in effect, is about the takeover of a country by the Chinese on a post about the Chinese control of the economy and not know what it says?
Either idiocy or the most amazing coincidence in the combined history of all mankind.
I think "idiocy" covers it.
"Mental Disease" would also work.
It's called sarcasm, anony 12:40 p.m. Apparently, it's lost on everyone here.
Anon
So first you claimed you did not know what it meant, now you claim it was used sarcastically. That makes you a liar, and as such, every other part of your statement must be discounted in the same light.
Please play your sarcasm game with a less intelligent crowd next time. I am sure it would go over well on the lefty blogs.
anony at 10:41 a.m. So first you claimed you did not know what it meant...
Where did I ever say that? All I said was that "The Chinese characters were a joke". I just copied and pasted them. I wasn't compelled to translate. You felt the urge, apparently. Congratulations. Give yourself a Chinese fortune cookie.
"Please play your sarcasm game with a less intelligent crowd next time."
I just did, and you made a mountain out of a molehill. And, I have no need to go to "lefty blogs". Just ones which I find "interesting", to put it mildly.
You implicitly stated you were not aware there was a cuss word in it. Or are you going to play the old Liberal "depends on what "is" is game?
Face it, you either lied then or are lying now. Either way, you are a liar.
It is sad to see you try to weasel your way out. Your identity is unknown so why dig a deeper hole?
Like I said, making a mountain out of a molehill. I cut and pasted Chinese symbols for S & G's. I wasn't concerned nor cared nor knew about its meaning. You told me that the phrase contained a cuss word. You "enlightened" me, and then proceeded to call me a liar after I provided my explanation. "Idiocy" I think does cover it.
If you want to continue with this charade, be my guest. It's quite entertaining.
Pathetic liberal. My God, what happened to the left. There used to at least be a semblance of intellectual thought. Is this all that's left?
The mere fact that you refer to me as part of the left on purely gut instinct is hysterical. So, I must be a liberal for challenging some of the blog entries here? Wow,
talk about a "semblance of intellectual thought"!
Note that I did not make an assumption about your political ideology. Don't know, don't care.
I must say I'm enjoying your circus.
Anon, I apologize for assuming you were a liberal based upon your postings in this thread. In my defense the assumption was predicated on the childishness of your comment and the lack of any persuasive argument.
David
"In my defense the assumption was predicated on the childishness of your comment and the lack of any persuasive argument."
Talk about being a buffoon. If you were truly apologetic, the statement above need not be included. No wonder people are sick of liberals and conservatives when they make those type of comments.
Besides, in my first blog entry, I provided several comments that I found relevant in refutation of the insistence on the brilliance of that advertisement.
Well, it's been entertaining to say the least. As Bill O'Reilly says (who actually has some ideas I agree with), I'll give you the last word.
Post a Comment