Wednesday, April 11, 2012

Homeland "Security", Mission Creep, and Totalitarianism

Oh, yes, ALL those words belong together in that headline.

...Our Nation’s vision of homeland security is a homeland safe and secure, resilient against terrorism and other hazards, and where American interests and aspirations and the American way of life can thrive. In seeking to fulfill this vision, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) aspires to avoid burdening minority and low- income populations with a disproportionate share of any adverse human health or environmental risks associated with our efforts to secure the Nation....

Some of you may have (stupidly) thought that "environmental justice" was not part of body-groping and nudie-scanning at airports.

Now you know better!

By the way, "environmental justice" is another term which cannot be defined.  IOW, it's a license for more totalitarianism from the Obozo Regime.

HT:  PowerLine

When "Law and Order" Crosses the Line

We mentioned that Republicans have a tendency to fall for "law and order" and "defense at any cost" silliness.

Here's another example, found by Boots/Sabers:

In an effort to make sure the most violent offenders are held accountable, Governor Walker today asked the Attorney General to submit a plan to implement the collection of DNA at the time of arrest for some felonies and serious sex-related offenses...

Really?  Mere 'arrest' is now an excuse for DNA collection?  We can't wait for charges to be filed?  Conviction (if any)?

The Governor ought to re-think this one.

"Formal and Material Cooperation"

Those are terms which were rarely used by the good-time-plastic-banana-rock-n-roll Bishops of the US throughout the '60's, '70's, '80's, and '90's.

That's because those terms had to do with..............SIN..........(and we all know that only Republicans are sinners ipso facto).........so who needs all that legal mumbo-jumbo, right?

Cdl. Burke was interviewed recently:

Thomas McKenna:  “So a Catholic employer, really getting down to it, he does not, or she does not provide this because that way they would be, in a sense, cooperating with the sin…the sin of contraception or the sin of providing a contraceptive that would abort a child, is this correct?”

Cardinal Burke:  “This is correct.  It is not only a matter of what we call “material cooperation” in the sense that the employer by giving this insurance benefit is materially providing for the contraception but it is also “formal cooperation” because he is knowingly and deliberately doing this, making this available to people. There is no way to justify it. It is simply wrong.

Abp Dolan, the current President of the USCC, has admitted that the US Bishops were utterly and totally derelict of their teaching duties on matters of sexuality beginning in the 1960's.

No kidding.

The Un-Definable As a Weapon

One thing that professional liars are good at is using un-definable terms.  (It also works for Stalinists.)

...According to media reports, "fairness" will be one of the central messages of the entire Obama campaign. So fittingly, the Senate will pretend to vote on the Paying a Fair Share Act -- or the "Buffett rule" -- later this week.

..."Fairness," an elusive idea normally exploited by spoiled children, is now the foundation of the Democratic Party's economy policy.

"Fairness" is much easier to enforce when you have all the guns, or are hiring hundreds of IRS agents every year, of course.

Willfully Blind

Foggy Bottom at its usual:

Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs Johnnie Carson said Monday that  “religion is not driving extremist violence” in Nigeria--just one day after a Christian church conducting an Easter service was targeted by a car bombing that left 39 dead.

Similarly, on Christmas Day, the Nigerian Islamist terrorist group, Boko Haram, attacked a Catholic church in that country, killing more than 40 people.

Had nothing to do with "religion."  See, those Christian and Catholic church-buildings happened to be in the wrong place.  If those buildings had been, say, 100 yards north, it woulda been "no problem," see?  

Nothing to see here.  Move along.

Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Obama Delenda Est

Moving on.

Obama delenda est.

Marxism hasn't worked anyplace it's been tried, and it won't work here.  

Saturday, April 07, 2012

Money Talks

Noted by McCain:

If Romney is indeed now the "inevitable" nominee, it is a status he has obtained by crushing conservative opposition in an astonishingly expensive and negative campaign: According to the Washington Post, Romney's super PAC has spent nearly $30 million on advertising, 91 percent of it on negative ads aimed at either Gingrich or Santorum. By some estimates, the Romney campaign is spending at a rate of more than $15 per vote, compared to less than $6 per vote for Santorum.

And with all that, he managed a FOUR-point 'victory' in Wisconsin.

My, my.  What an amazing display of electoral strength!

Sewer Engineers (CH2MHill) Have a Problem

The engineering firm most famous for MMSD has another problem.

A Colorado-based consulting, engineering and construction firm, named CH2M Hill, was awarded nearly $2 billion from the stimulus to perform cleanup work at the Hanford nuclear site.

The company used those funds to hire roughly 1,300 employees.

They then inflated the hiring numbers by using a Department of Energy metric known as "lives touched", which allowed them to boast that the stimulus helped somehow helped or 'touched' three-and-a-half times as many people as they had actually employed.

When the stimulus funds ran out, so did the ability to support the jobs created or lives touched. Roughly 1,500 employees were laid off.

Net/net, Hanford Site lost 200 workers.

But that's not all!!

The Department of Labor has awarded a $1.3 million National Emergency Grant to help laid-off Hanford workers find jobs.

The largest portion of the money will be used for retraining former Hanford workers who lost their jobs as federal economic stimulus spending at the nuclear reservation came to an end.

Hanford Site will have contractors forever; it is a mess.  The mess isn't helped by "stimulus", nor by craven contracting practices.

HT:  AOSHQ

GSA Executive Speaks Truth on Gummint

Reported at HuffPo, through the Blaze:

“Meetings are good to have in between breaks,” the clown mocks. “Government — if you think the problems we create are bad, just wait until you see our solutions.”

The Government official who played 'the clown' has not yet been identified. 

Who's 'Politicizing' SCOTUS?

Umnnhhh....yah, well,.........

Barack Obama’s argument that the Supreme Court should not reject Obamacare because it would be an “unprecedented” move against the will of a “democratically elected” Congress means that his Department of Justice should be supporting, not opposing, the federal Defense of Marriage Act, according to legal analysts..

DOMA really DID have 'overwhelming majority' support (bi-partisan, too).  So in Obozo's alleged 'mind,' "judicial activism" is overturning Obozocare, but it is NOT "activism" to overturn DOMA.

Sure. 

Friday, April 06, 2012

Es Ist Vollbracht

The St John Passion of JSBach, aria "It Is Consummated"

Note the half-steps, the musical 'sign' of death.

More Homeland "Security" Chickens***

Is there REALLY a reason for keeping Homeland "Security"?

The government presented no evidence – none – that the Joneses intended to evade the reporting requirements. Kyle told Hernandez that he did not know the amount of money he was carrying. Saying “I do not know” is not a deliberate failure to report. After Hernandez insisted on an answer, Kyle said that he would have to guess.’ Guessing is not a material omission or a misstatement of fact – certainly not one the government can use to steal the money. --PowerLine quoting a Fed Judge opinion

Homeland "Security" stole $31K from a couple--and now WE get to pay the lawyer's fees and court costs--not to mention paying the salaries and bennies of these assholes.

Hostage to PRChina? Thank the Gummint!!!

Actually, you ARE a hostage to PRChina, and yes, the FedGov put you there.

Even a (D) Senator gets it!

American businesses are finding it easier to do business with the ChiComs than with the American government to get these minerals. Democrat Sen. Bob Casey of Pennsylvania writes that China is leveraging its position (and the Obama administration’s regulatory hostility to mining) to hold a monopoly.

How does China maintain its control over rare earth elements? For one thing, it controls production. The only mine currently producing rare earths is based in China. They also ensure that most of the supplies remain in China by deliberately limiting exports through strict quotas and stiff duties. These illegal measures operate to chill exports and drive global prices through the roof.

As a consequence, today American manufacturers struggle with ever-escalating costs of production, compromising the ability of American companies to compete and create jobs.

--Gateway quoting  the Hill

Let me repeat:  dump 20% of the FedGov staff from the payroll, along with the regulations they enforce.

Screw this bunch of micro-despots (and their godfather, Obozo). 

Congress Isn't the Only "Mockery"

Here's the nominee for Moron of the Week:

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said that the U.S. government’s long-term fiscal commitments are “unsustainable,” but that they should not be the country’s top priority, because the government still needs to “do things.”

“Our fiscal commitments are unsustainable over the long run, but we cannot put our long-run fiscal challenges above all others,” Geithner told the Economic Club of Chicago on Wednesday. “We have to be willing to do things, not just cut things.”

Here's what you "do", Timmy.

Cut 20% of Gummint staff across the board, for starters.  And zero out travel/entertainment budgets.

That's "doing" stuff.

No Kidding?!?

Somebody figured it out.

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) reported that federal spending will drive the national debt to “unsustainable” levels in the coming decades, fueled by ever-rising health care costs and federal entitlement spending.

It's the SPENDING, Stupid!

Thursday, April 05, 2012

The ACLU Wrote ObozoCare's Anti-Religion Regulation

To the ACLU, the First Amendment is anathema.

...In 2000, the California Contraceptive Equity Law was passed. In it there is a provision defining what qualifies as a religious employer, and it was written by the ACLU. Besides noting that the institution must be a non-profit, the exact qualifying language is as follows:

“The inculcation of religious values is the purpose of the entity”

“The entity primarily employs persons who share the religious tenets of the entity”

“The entity serves primarily persons who share the religious tenets of the entity”

The Health and Human Services edict forcing Catholic institutions to provide for abortion-inducing drugs in their insurance coverage also allows an exemption for groups it deems religious. Besides noting the non-profit status, the exact qualifying language is as follows:

“Has the inculcation of religious values as its purpose”

“Primarily employs persons who share its religious tenets”

“Primarily serves persons who share its religious tenets

Gee.  That alternative moniker, "Anti-Christian Libertine Union" fits better every day.

Wednesday, April 04, 2012

"Think Marbury Didn't Happen? Then Show Us!!"

The Fifth Circuit is a bit feisty--and definitely Conservative.  So when Obozo denied the existence of Marbury,.....

...a three-member panel of the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals has ordered the U.S. Department of Justice to "answer by Thursday whether the Obama Administration believes that the courts have the right to strike down a federal law."

The response is to be three pages long, single-spaced, according to an unnamed lawyer who was in the courtroom.

I love it.

"For your homework, Mr. US Attorney General, please demonstrate that our 150++ strikedowns of un-Constitutional Federal laws did not happen.  Show your work."

And tell your Statist-in-Chief to shove it, too.

We Love Our State Employees, Right?

You may or may not love them, but you sure PAY them well.

Wisconsin taxpayers still pay significantly more to provide health insurance to state employees than taxpayers in surrounding states, even after increasing the employee premium contribution and making plan changes to reduce costs.  Wisconsin taxpayers also continue to pay significantly more than most private‐sector employers in the greater Milwaukee area.

Sweet!

Wisconsin employees enjoy (literally) a no-deductible, $1,000 (family)/$500.00 (single) stop-loss plan, for which they contribute $972 (single) and $2412 (family) premium per year.

Nice work, if you can get it.

It's Not the Earmark. It's the Logrolling!

The slime continues to ooze.

Republican Representative Steven LaTourette, an 18-year House veteran, said the earmark ban “has affected discipline” within the party. “You can’t get 218 votes (out of 242 Republican House members) and part of that has to be if you can’t give people anything (earmarks), you can’t take anything away from them.”
 
If a member of Congress agrees with 90 percent of a pending bill but is “uncomfortable” with the other 10 percent, “Sometimes taking care of your district (with earmarks) made up for that 10 percent,” he said.  --RedStates quoting Reuters

Oh, goodie!!  Here's the plain-language version of that crap:

It’s not about the $500,000 earmark.  It’s about the $500,000 earmark that is used to buy off a conservative vote for a $1 trillion omnibus or some other terrible transformational legislation.

We sent this slime to Congress.  It's time to apply a lot of bleach.  Direct-spray is a good method,.

Monday, April 02, 2012

The Not-Very-Sweeping Ruling Against Act 10

Somehow, this didn't make the MSM.

....the failure of [the dues-collection] portion to stand up did not seem – at least in the court’s opinion – to be a situation where the start can’t stop the unions from collecting voluntary dues by payroll deduction, but rather that they can’t be selective in doing so. The problem, it seems, was that Walker – likely in an effort to bolster public support – exempted “mandatory public safety” unions such as police and firefighters from the rule.

Hoist by his own petard.  This has to do with the somewhat cockeyed 'traditional GOP' view that ANY spending on cops, firemen, or the Pentagon is, ipso facto, GOOD spending.  (See Sensenbrenner's Big Stupid Mistake below, e.g.).

No actual Conservative believes that crap, by the way.