Anyone who pays attention to the news knows that the ABC affiliate in Minneapolis (Channel 5) had video of the shooting (go to 5:00 in this post) from an excellent angle. It was above the ground and from the front of the car, unlike the home video used by the Leftists.
So why didn't Channel 12--another ABC affiliate--use that video?
Maybe they didn't want you to see it, as it showed the woman's attempt to run over the ICE agent very clearly.
It's not what they tell you. It's also what they DON'T tell you.
3 comments:
She didn’t try to run him over. Her wheels were turned. She was trying to flee the scene. He was a step away from the side and easily could have moved.
There was no reason for the officer to even have his gun out as she wasnt posing a real threat to anyone.
This is the Asley Babbit Rorschach test. There are so many parallels between the situations. Both women disobeyed a direct order from an armed officer and moved towards them.
If the police officer truly thought his life was in danger, then he had cause to shoot. But in the MN situation, he also put himself in a position in front of that vehicle. Its pretty obvious hat woman was never trying to run him over, she was trying to leave after blocking traffic and impeding the officers.
A frame-by-frame analysis of video showed otherwise, Dad29. The SUV did move toward the ICE agent as he stood in front of it. But the agent was able to move out of the way and fire at least two of three shots from the side of the vehicle as it veered past him.
Now, to be objective (unlike Dad29), if there
is a bullet hole in the windshield from the front, that would tend to support the officers' contention he was about to be run down. But the bullets came from the side windows, which means the car already passed the officer and he was not in immediate danger. No justification for the use of deadly force.
So, the narrative that she was “running them down” is straight up disinformation.
Post a Comment