Certain pundits--like Mr. Johnson of PowerLine--absolutely despise Tucker Carlson for 'just asking questions.' That's because the answers might be embarrassing--at the very least--for a certain small Middle Eastern country which sucks up a lot of US taxpayer dollars. So happens that country is a fave of Mr. Johnson, sometimes to the detriment of the country he actually lives in. And we all know that lawyers never 'just ask questions', right?
Here are a few interesting questions that Tucker is asking about the 9/11 event:
...The CIA was fully aware that many of the 9/11 hijackers were in the United States, planning a terror attack. Why didn’t they alert the FBI and the American public?
What happened to World Trade Center Building 7? The people in charge don’t want you to know this, but it collapsed just like the Twin Towers, even though it wasn’t hit by a plane. The official narrative is that a fire stemming from Ground Zero caused its destruction. If that were true, wouldn’t the skyscraper between Building 7 and the Twin Towers have fallen, too? Why was the rubble and steel from that building carted off within hours of its collapse and sent out of the country? Why did an analysis conducted by chemists find traces of explosive material in the dust after the structure’s fall? How did the BBC publish a report saying the building had fallen before it actually came down? And why doesn’t the 9/11 Commission’s official report address any of this?
An unknown investor shorted American Airlines and United Airlines, the companies whose planes Al-Qaeda used on 9/11, just before the attacks. They made an enormous amount of money doing so. The FBI discovered the identity of the person or institution that made that lucrative bet, and therefore likely knew the attacks were coming, but never made it public. Why? Who are they protecting?
Law enforcement arrested a band of foreigners who filmed the inflamed World Trade Center as the morning unfolded. The group possessed foreign passports and large amounts of cash, and the FBI believed at least two of its members had intelligence ties. One went on to say that they were in the United States “to document the event.” This raises an obvious question: how did they know there would be an event to document in the first place? Wouldn’t that require foreknowledge? And if the FBI thought they were spies, why would it let them go?...
No doubt The Epicurean Patel and his Tonto Bongino will be opening those files immediately, right?
Right??
No comments:
Post a Comment