Best way to overcome US power?
A national-security watchdog group is asking members of Congress to take a closer look at an energy transition advocacy nonprofit that has ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). According to State Armor, the watchdog group, nonprofits are coordinating with U.S. climate groups to influence climate policy, advance the interests of the CCP and undermine U.S. national security....
... the [Chinese Communist Party] is co-opting the American progressive climate change lobby to advance a transition away from fossil fuels. The alternative technologies being pushed by this lobby, according to the report, create significant economic and geopolitical advantages by undermining U.S. energy dominance and leaving it dependent on Chinese supply chains for its energy production. ...
Some researchers suspect that the ChiComs have planted 'kill switches' inside some 'green energy' devices, too.
... The report focuses on Energy Foundation China (EFC) and documents the group’s ties to climate advocacy groups in the U.S. that are influencing climate policy....
It's the Usual Suspects: Hewlett Foundation, MacArthur Foundation, Rocky Mountain Institute, ClimateWorks....
If ICE doesn't have anything else to do on Saturday, they could toss all those foundation peeps out of the country, too. Red China would be a great place to dump them!
1 comment:
The Gotch hasn't heard too much from the criminally insane UNIPCC; you?
An absolute epitome of grift/graft, the UNIPCC conducts no research of its own, which should come as no surprise. Follow the money; it’s not in the research, it’s in the solutions recommended by the Summary for Policy-Makers (SPM) addendum to its Assessment Reports (AR’s).
While this may come as something of a surprise, the “solutions” quite often benefit financially those who propose them. Wondering why the UNIPCC has fought reform and scrutiny? Wonder no more.
The UNIPCC answers to no one, has no obligation to give an audience to anyone who doesn’t confirm the “Consensus” and has NO Conflict-Of-Interest (COI) provision.
A while back, an INTERACADEMY COUNCIL investigation recommended sweeping changes to the UNIPCC.
“*(T)he council said (that the UNIPCC) needs a full-time executive director, more openness and regular changes in leadership. It called for stronger enforcement of its reviews of research and adoption of a COI policy, which the IPCC does not have, even though its parent agencies do.” The COI issue was raised because of former Chair Rajendra Pachauri’s work as adviser and board member of green energy companies, etc., etc., etc.
The UNIPCC’s response? “FUCK OFF!!
These TRILLION$ in “solutions” here are financed by ‘taking dollars from poor people in rich countries and giving it to rich people in poor countries.’
Why did the Maldives take a half a BILLION in “Climate Reparations” and build golf courses and airports to promote tourism (Fly-In Golfers?) rather than moving all their $#!t to higher ground?
The Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX), comprised of a veritable Who’s Who of Climate Criminal Lefties; (Al Gore, Jr., Maurice Strong, Frank Raines, Uncle Georgie Soros, the Lefty Foundations, et al) WAS SHUTTERED for failing to fulfill the one reason for its existence: Lining the pockets of Gucci-slippered Carbon Traders and rent-seeking corporations.
Expected to generate trades reaching into the 14 figures, it would have been a Lefty Statist’s wet freakin’ dream!
“At its founding in November 2000, it was estimated that the size of CCX’s carbon trading market could reach $500 billion. That estimate ballooned over the years to $10 trillion.”
That’s some serious jack for trading what amounts to thin air.
The kind of people that kind of money tends to attract ARE NOT Sunday School teachers or the Boy Scout Den Mothers...
The Gotch
Post a Comment