As you might expect from Thomas, a real illumination in very few words.
...Thomas argued that the legal principle of substantive due process, which has been used to protect unenumerated rights like privacy and same-sex marriage, lacks constitutional grounding. He described it as “an oxymoron that lack[s] any basis in the Constitution,” and emphasized that such decisions should be revisited to determine whether other constitutional provisions might support the rights they claim to protect.
“Substantive due process exalts judges at the expense of the People from whom they derive their authority,” Thomas wrote, adding that it has led to “constitutionally unmoored policy judgments.”...
Queer marriage being one, and you can expect that the Tranny issue will be another.
This insanity is what prompts such as Hannah Dugan to openly, knowingly, and happily break Federal Law and claim "immunity." It never occured to her double-digit IQ that such activity could rebound with tragic results for her and the country. Moreso the insurrections of such as Boese at the Federal level.
That "unmooring" is not only Constitutional. It's a rebellion Nature, and Nature's God.
Those rebellions never end well.
No comments:
Post a Comment