The Encrushment of the Deep State and Its Judge-Puppets

 Wauck tracks all sorts of stuff and summarizes the good parts.

Here are the good parts.  Here he's quoting Margot Cleveland:

... Donald Trump is not acting like a dictator. And he’s not acting like a king. He’s governing as the executive — the position to which he was elected by a majority of voters.

Yet with every decision President Trump makes, the left responds with claims that our very democracy is at risk. But, as is often the case, if you allow the ignorant to talk long enough, they shine a light on their stupidity — and their true motives. ...

... [Susan] Rice then added a further talking point — one prevalently paraded by those attacking Donald Trump: These officials “all take an oath to the Constitution of the United States. Not to any individual President or any individual leader.”

An oath to the Constitution of the United States, however, includes an oath to uphold Article II, which expressly provides “[t]he executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States.” ...

Clear, except to the willfully blind self-serving tax-leeches and cancers.  But I understate...

... Declaring then that executive officials should maintain an independence from, or act as a resistance to, the president, represents a perversion to our Constitution and democracy by demanding executive authority be wrested from the unitary executive and gifted instead “to a person who answers to no one and for whom no one voted.”...

Yes.  Did you elect Anthony Fauci, MD--the most prominent graduate of the Jos. Mengele School of Medicine?  Did you??

Now to Shipwrecked Crew:

 Let me summarize the circularity of what Hampton Delliger has done today:

“..., Dellinger proposes to use his “Executive Power” to cancel the exercise of “Executive Power” by the Executive from whom his Executive power originates. So, on Trump’s behalf, Dellinger proposes to prohibit Trump from taking action via the Executive Order Trump signed.”...

Thus making a fool out of Judge Jackson, who granted his preliminary stay.  (A more deserving fool would be hard to find--but there are candidates!)

 ...So now we'll have a test of whether the Judiciary gets to direct federal government spending via TRO.

Not only do I think the DOJ expected this result -- I think they actually goaded the Plaintiffs and the Judge into this outcome.

Again, this is a fight they want to have because it is intended to hem-in the perceived authority that District Judges' believe themselves to have to direct the operations of the Executive branch.

I think they saw Judge Ali as an easy mark - he took the bait and has run with it....

 So Judge Ali competes with Judge Jackson for "Greatest Fool."

Cage-match of Dummies-in-Black!!