While it is difficult for Leftists like Sally Yates to think logically, Silly Sally's position on Trump's immigration E.O. is not supported by any U.S. law.
Ted Cruz ripped that blankey from Sally's hands.
Cruz: Well, are you familiar with 8 U.S.C. section 1182?
Yates: Not off the top of my head, no.
Yates claimed to be practicing law at Justice, but is 'not familiar' with the law under which Trump promulgated the E.O. Really?
Sally had a comeback, though--which muddle-brained Lefties (like the one that rhymes with puffmost) claim is governing.
...I’m also familiar with an additional provision of the INA [Immigration
and Nationality Act] that says “no person shall receive preference or be
discriminated against in issuance of a visa because of race,
nationality, or place of birth,”...
Oooooh!! That might have smarted, but for the reality of Silly Sally's preferred law:
...Under federal law, the executive branch is expressly required to take religion into account in determining who is granted asylum...
Now then, one can hardly be a "refugee" fearing religious discrimination if one is a Muslim departing a Muslim country, eh? Let us be more clear, for the Leftoids attempting to read this:
... Asylum is a
discretionary national act of compassion that is directed, by law not whim, to address persecution....
Above and beyond all that, no foreigner enjoys (U.S.) Constitutional rights. It is true that all humans enjoy God-given rights--which are partially enumerated in the Constitution--but while those claims to rights are valid, they are not identical to those enjoyed by U.S. citizens in domestic courts, and they certainly do not take precedence over the rights of U.S citizens when national security is at risk.
Silly Sally and her idol, Obama, may *feeeeeeeel* otherwise, but in the end, there is no RIGHT to emigrate to the US. None.
Buh-bye, Sally.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment