In the case at hand, The Ass is a homosexual-activist who happens to be a (retired) jurist.
“This blog post is a piece of journalism, breaking a story that
should be of public interest regarding the conduct of a former jurist on
a significant case. This site does not advocate an anti-gay rights
agenda, and the proprietor of this web site is a supporter of gay
marriage (although he disapproves of the imposition of gay marriage on
society through judicial fiat)…..But the behavior of Walker, as revealed
by these emails, creates the appearance of a partisan rather than an
impartial former jurist who simply believes he issued a correct ruling.
Walker was so invested in his ruling that he wanted to watch the
appellate courts’ argument himself. He went out of his way to make sure
that he consulted with the winning side to help them prevail in the
appellate courts. Specifically, he sought to learn whether his
attendance at the appellate arguments would be acceptable to the
prevailing party — and when told it would not be, he deferred to the
prevailing party’s media strategy. All of this, cumulatively, suggests
an emotional investment in the outcome of the case. The emails are
likely to reinforce the widely held perception among Prop. 8 supporters
that Walker was less than impartial in his rulings during the trial.” --Patterico, quoted at Shepherd
No s*&^, Sherlock.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
suggests an emotional investment in the outcome of the case.
I suppose if Judge Walker had been a conservative Christian he wouldn't have had an emotional investment in the case?
And Walker must not have been much of a homosexual activist if nobody was aware of his homosexuality prior to his decision in the case.
Extermination Jim. Nothing less for your ilk.
Looks like we have a member of the Hitler Youth chiming in, eh, anony 6:32 p.m.?
Weren't you banned already, John Foust?
Nice try, Hitler Youth. Leave MY America.
Post a Comment