Jay reiterates his argument that no breakfast means no reading.
It's FAR more accurate to say "no father around, no reading."
Jay's argument is Post hoc, propter hoc, and fallacious (although I am sympathetic to Jay and his colleagues.)
"Poverty" will not be eliminated. Ever. And if MPS keeps handing out free rubbers to the darlings, reading skills will not be improved, either.
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Post a Comment