You may think that there has to be some limit to Federal targeting of dissidents.
You would be wrong.
...If the Deep State can unilaterally determine what constitutes “national security,” and if the judicial branch is not going to review or challenge those determinations, then the executive branch can target people, target institutions, and/or conduct domestic surveillance while hiding their conduct behind the shield of national security.
That’s exactly what the weaponized institutions (DHS, DOJ, FBI) have been doing.
That’s exactly the process that Barack Obama and Eric Holder created.
That’s exactly the motive for Eric Holder creating the DOJ National Security Division (DOJ-NSD)....
"Ah," you say. "We have courts for that!! Julia Roberts will stop this.!!"
Wrong again, mal-educated Civics 101-breath. (Next you'll think that being a "citizen" confers "rights.")
.....Now, can you see the bigger issue, as presented by the Twitter case against government, that was just highlighted by the Supreme Court decision not to get involved.
The DOJ-NSD is the targeting mechanism for corrupt interests in our government to target us. The Dept of Homeland Security and the FBI unite in the process and provide the results to the DOJ-NSD for action against the targets. The collaboration then uses “national security” as the technique to stop those being abused by the targeting system from ever finding out, and the judicial branch cannot provide oversight....
"Cannot" = "Will Not" provide oversight.
Shut up and pay your taxes as you contemplate this picture of Washington, D.C.:
No comments:
Post a Comment