WEF's Schwab: A Kissinger/CIA Op

Nice to see it laid out, but can't say it's surprising.

...If you have a decent knowledge of Klaus Schwab’s history, you will know that he attended Harvard in the 1960s where he would meet then-Professor Henry A. Kissinger, a man with whom Schwab would form a lifelong friendship. But, as with most information from the annals of the World Economic Forum’s history books, what you’ve been told is not the full story. In fact, Kissinger would recruit Schwab at the International seminar at Harvard, which had been funded by the US’ Central Intelligence Agency. Although this funding was exposed the year in which Klaus Schwab left Harvard, the connection has gone largely unnoticed – until now.

My research indicates that the World Economic Forum is not a European creation. In reality, it is instead an operation which emanates from the public policy grandees of the Kennedy, Johnson and Nixonian eras of American politics; all of whom had ties to the Council on Foreign Relations and the associated “Round Table” Movement, with a supporting role played by the Central Intelligence Agency....

Oh, goodie! 

Globaloney Kissinger is one leader of that band.  Also remember this:  Kissinger served as Secretary of State and had a great deal to do with shaping that Department's philosophy, hiring, training, and lust for power.  Fortunately, most of the Kissinger hires are getting very old.

 ...In 1950, Kissinger would graduate from Harvard with a degree in political science where he would study under William Yandell Elliott, who would eventually be a political advisor to six US presidents and would also serve as a mentor to Zbigniew Brzezinski and Pierre Trudeau, among others. Yandell Elliott, along with many of his star pupils, would serve as the key connectors between the American national security establishment and the British “Round Table” movement, embodied by organisations such as Chatham House in the UK and the Council on Foreign Relations in the United States. They would also seek to impose global power structures shared by Big Business, the political elite and academia. ...

Remember that Brzezinski is a heavyweight Deep State guy and--of course--Globalist.  Hardly the only one who influenced Henry, either:

 ...By 1954, Kissinger was hoping to become a junior professor at Harvard but, instead, the dean of Harvard at the time, McGeorge Bundy – another pupil of William Yandell Elliott, recommended Kissinger to the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). At the CFR, Kissinger would start managing a study group on nuclear weapons. From 1956 to 1958, Kissinger also became the Director of Special Studies for the Rockefeller Brothers Fund (David Rockefeller was vice-president of the CFR during this period), as well as going on to direct multiple panels....

Kissinger decided that the US' foreign policy in force since 1789 or so just wouldn't cut it any more.

 ...It was clear that Prof Henry A Kissinger had identified American involvement in European policy creation as being vital in the future peace and stability of the world. At this time, Kissinger was based at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Here, the future founder of the World Economic Forum, a young Klaus Schwab, would catch the eye of Henry A Kissinger....

The seminars Schwab attended were funded by the CIA--which, of course, CIA denies.

Which begins the s**tstorm we are living through now.

A section on John Kenneth Galbraith follows in the essay.  Galbraith became the economics mentor to Schwab.

Another segment focuses on Herman Kahn, whose professional life was devoted to analysis of the nuclear-war threat.  Kahn was favorable and open about creating a Euro-American super-state.

 ...In 1967, Herman Kahn would write one of the most important futurist works of the 20th century, The Year 2000: A Framework for Speculation on the Next Thirty-Three Years. In this book, co-authored by Anthony J Wiener, Khan and company predicted where we would be technologically at the end of the millennium. But there was another document released soon after Kahn’s The Year 2000, which had been written simultaneously. That document entitled, Ancillary Pilot Study for the Educational Policy Research Program: Final Report, was to map out how to achieve the future society Kahn’s work in The Year 2000 had envisaged.

Under a section titled “Special Educational Needs of Decision-Makers”, the paper states: “The desirability of explicitly educated decision-makers so that they are better able, in effect, to plan the destiny of the nation, or to carry out the plans formulated through a more democratic process, should be very seriously considered. One facet of this procedure would be the creation of a shared set of concepts, shared language, shared analogies, shared references…” He goes on to state in the same section that: “Universal re-teaching in the spirit of the humanistic tradition of Europe – at least for its comprehensive leadership group – might be useful in many ways.”...

Kahn did not mention that the 'European humanistic tradition' was, in fact, secular humanism:  the human without God--an experiment which failed lots of times, often referred to as "Babylon."  But all things considered, Kahn was easily the most sensible player in geo-politics at the time.  He made it clear that nuclear war was extremely un-likely--no matter who had the Bomb.

But that didn't fit into Schwab's game, as we shall see.  Schwab favors Fear.

...In 1970, Kahn would travel to Europe with Galbraith to support Klaus Schwab’s recruitment drive for the first European Management Symposium. In 1971, Kahn would be sitting centre stage to watch John Kenneth Galbraith’s keynote speech at the historic first session of the policy making organisation which would eventually become the World Economic Forum....

In the end, it was Kissinger and an industrialist named by Peter Schmidheiny, who launched Schwab and the WEF.

So what is Schwab pursuing?

...If people perceive you as an all powerful evil villain then you may not gain the support of the common man, but you will gain the attention from those who seek power and wealth, or, how Klaus Schwab would refer to them, the “stakeholders” in society. This is very important to understand – the projection of extreme wealth and power will attract and bring the “stakeholders” of society to the World Economic Forum’s table. With those “stakeholders” on board, Klaus Schwab’s main ideological product, “stakeholder capitalism”, will see the transfer of power away from true democratic processes and onto a system of governance by a small preselected leadership group, who will be trained to continue the agenda set for them by the previous generation, as predicted by Herman Kahn. They will hold all the cards, whilst the common people will be left with just illusory pseudo-democratic processes, poverty, and constant absurd psychological operations to distract us all constantly. Klaus Schwab would soon become everything Herman Kahn had feared during his most pessimistic predictions. When the Club of Rome produced “The Limits to Growth” report, Herman Kahn would refute its findings and rally against its pessimism, whilst, at the same time, Klaus Schwab would make it central to his machinations and have their founder be the keynote speaker at his forum in Davos....

 Whether fear of The Bomb, or fear of mass starvation-----or fear of plague AND starvation AND nuclear war (as is being hyped at this time).

The author offers the theory that Schwab's days are numbered and the World Economic Forum will die with him because ordinary people will see through it and prefer benign nationalism, just as does Trump, following PJ Buchanan and the Founding Fathers, among others.

We would suggest that 'ordinary people' understand that they are not God, too.  And they definitely understand that current 'world leaders' are ALSO Not God.