Friday, December 02, 2011

Does "Right to Petition" Include "Right to Destroy"?

Althouse doesn't think much of Walker's 'permit-and-bond' requirement for groups who protest.

She doesn't bother to explain when "petition" morphed into "trash and paralyze".
Posted by at

5 comments:

Jim said...

What about the "original' Tea Party?

12/03/2011 1:10 PM
Amy said...

Yes, 18th century behavior being use to justify destructive liberalism in the 21st century.

Like comparing apples and kumquats, really.

12/04/2011 2:43 AM
Jim said...

Some 18th century is still glorified. Otherwise, explain the 21st century "Tea Party."

12/04/2011 12:25 PM
TerryN said...

Explanation: Taxed Enough Already, hence TEA. To call it a glorification of something 18th century is ignorant or sophist.

12/04/2011 3:27 PM
Terrence Berres said...

On the contrary, Gov. Palin's "party like it's 1773" indicates neither ignorance nor sophism. [link]

12/05/2011 8:32 AM

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)