"Vetting" Afghans? Not Too Good.

 It looks like "vetting" of Afghan refugees (CIA buddies) was problematic.  Propaganda motives aside, it was a lot of guesswork--and still is. 

One glaring omission from all of these stories?  Mohammedanism as a factor.  There's a reason for that, as we'll see below.

More than 5,000 Afghans brought to the US after American forces withdrew from the country got flagged for “national security” issues, Department of Homeland Security data obtained by The Post reveals.

In all, the feds uncovered “potential derogatory information” on a total of 6,868 people who came from Afghanistan as part of President Biden’s Operation Allies Welcome in 2021.

Of that number, 5,005 came up with a national security concern, while 956 people had “public safety” concerns and 876 were flagged for fraud, according to the data....

Well, that's a problem.  Fortunately, that number got a lot smaller.

 ...While various US agencies were able to resolve many of the red flags, as of September there were still 885 people with potentially negative national security information – posing a possible threat....

(We are VERY suspicious about "reports" using 'potentially' and 'possible.'  So the Grassley-leaked info looks to be an attempt at propaganda or--if you prefer--'less than totally honest wording.')

But there's something else.

 ...Even while compiling its report, the IGs office noted the feds charged two Afghan nationals, Nasir Ahmad Tawhedi and Abdullah Haji Zada, with planning an ISIS-inspired plot to try to disrupt the 2024 elections in Oklahoma City.

Tawhedi — who came into the US in 2021 on a Special Immigrant Visa and obtained two AK-47 assault rifles and 500 rounds of ammo in 2024 — pleaded guilty in June to providing material support for ISIS and faces up to 35 years in prison. Zada, 19, got a 15-year sentence. ...

IOW, Muslim extremists.  Recall that the D.C. killer reportedly yelled "Allahu Akhbar" as he opened fire on the Guard members.

Official Washington is incapable of recognizing the tribal influence of religion on its adherents.  Bush the Dumber was a classic example of that, as has been the US State Department vis-a-vis the slaughter of Christians Catholics in Nigeria. (Yes, they are CATHOLIC.)  That's because the pro-forma "membership" in churches of the Governing Class of idiots is just that:  pro-forma.  Handy for getting elected, otherwise meaningless.

The Establishment simply cannot grok religious motives.  The single curious exception is the 'religiously-motivated' Zionists in the Middle East, who are granted a free pass to eradicate non-Jews on 'religious' grounds, from areas in which they have lived for hundreds--if not thousands--of years.

Why is that?