The new hotness in J-school: "Set your narrative, go with it. Your readers are stupid!"
And that's how the Journal-Sentinel Pravda rolls.
The mid-length story whitewashing the November 3rd election fraud quotes some nice Pubbie woman Senator-ess from Up Nort' and an aged, has-been country-club horse-riding New Jersey resident, both vaguely indicating that there were no problems at all.
Then it moves on to find a few election clerks from North Noplace who attest to machine integrity (a position held by MOST who doubt the overall integrity of the election) and who explain what should--and should not--be retained. They also complain about being overworked, or something. Life's a bitch, sweetie.
That's their story, and their story-tellers, and they're sticking to it.
That means they asked no questions about Milwaukee, Dane, Brown, Kenosha, or Racine results. Even more important, the largest concern---that of "mail-in" vote-harvesting--was never mentioned. The next-largest worry--that of "indefinitely confined" fraud--was mentioned waaaaaayyyyy down near the bottom. And, of course, there was ZERO mention of Dane County's blatant, in-your-face, "vote in the park and we won't have chain-of-custody" game. The name "Spindell" never made it to print here, either.
(Not mentioned at all: the WEC preventing both the Green Party AND Kanye West from a space on the ballot on technicalities. Both of them would have siphoned lots of votes from the Chosen Winner, Biden*.)
Those concerns would disturb the narrative, wouldn't they?
One more thing: they DO mention that Evers vetoed election-security reforms. So there's that. Do they care? Who knows? Nobody ever pressed that chipmunk-IQ twit about it.
See, you dummies are supposed to have confidence because..........ahhhhhhhh, well.......shut up.
No comments:
Post a Comment