Channel 12 ran a very brief item today flogging their Sunday talk show. During the tease, Don Millis, a Republican appointee to the State Election Commission, carried on about "conspiracy theories."
It would be very nice if, in a lawyerly fashion, Mr. Millis would define "conspiracy theory."
Is it a "conspiracy theory" to opine that there were a lot of statistically-improbable events and vote totals in the '20 election in Wisconsin? Or is that opinion one which people may hold without being slandered?
Is it a "conspiracy theory" to notice that there was never any audit of signature-matches on mail-in ballots? (We don't care about Clark County. We care about Dane, Milwaukee, Brown, Kenosha, and Racine Counties.)
Is it a "conspiracy theory" to notice that people who claimed to be 'unable to get out of their homes to vote' were enjoying themselves in wintertime outdoor activities only a few weeks later?
Is it a "conspiracy theory" to state that Ms. Wolfe acted illegally in approving "drop boxes"--which were the scenes of multiple late-night large-quantity ballot drops? Or that she illegally advised locals that they could 'fill in the blanks' on incomplete ballot applications?
Or is Mr. Millis going to do what Robin Vos tells him to do: STFU about the obvious problems and call anyone who asks questions a nutbag?
On the other hand, it's possible that Millis cannot and will not define the term, which will tell you all you need to know about Millis and his sponsor, Vos.
No comments:
Post a Comment