It would be easy enough to list other moral beliefs and customs that are part of the foundation of a prosperous economy, but we draw near to the end of this book. So instead we turn back, for a moment, to one vice we discussed earlier—and to the virtue which is the opposite of that vice.
The vice is called envy; the virtue is called generosity.
Envy is a sour emotion that condemns a person to loneliness. Generosity is an emotion that attracts friends.
The generous man or woman is very ready to praise others sincerely and to help them instead of hindering them. Generosity brings admiration of the achievements and qualities of other people.
The vice is called envy; the virtue is called generosity.
Envy is a sour emotion that condemns a person to loneliness. Generosity is an emotion that attracts friends.
The generous man or woman is very ready to praise others sincerely and to help them instead of hindering them. Generosity brings admiration of the achievements and qualities of other people.
The warning (and prophesy) follows:
A spirit of generosity toward others is still at work in America. But in much of the world, a very different spirit has come to prevail. In Marxist lands, envy is approved by the men in power. Private wealth and personal success are denounced on principle. The Marxist indoctrinator deliberately preaches envy. By appealing to that strong vice, he may be able to pull down constitutions, classes, and religions.
Because the market brings substantial success to a good many individuals, the Marxist hates the market. A consistent Marxist declares that when two people exchange goods in any market, both are cheated. Yes, both—that is what the Marxist says. Exchange itself is “capitalist oppression,” the Marxist propagandist proclaims. Certainly there is little profitable exchange in Communist countries. Envying the market’s popularity and success, the Marxist denounces the market furiously.
In the long run, the envious society brings on proletarian tyranny and general poverty. In both the short run and the long run, the generous society encourages political freedom and economic prosperity.
Almost as though he had heard Obozo and Pelosi before he wrote the essay, eh?
Evidently Kuhner (WaTimes) read the same essay.
Occupy Wall Street — a movement composed of communists, anarchists, socialists and anti-globalization student radicals — is spreading. Protests have swelled in cities including New York, Washington, Los Angeles, Chicago, Denver and Philadelphia. The protesters are gaining influence and numbers. A ragtag group of hippie students has turned into a potent political force.
Marx & Co. are (reportedly) coming to Milwaukee on October 15th.
2 comments:
From an Aristotelian perspective, a virtue should have two opposites: thus, generosity should be on a scale that runs from envy to some vice that has to do with being insufficiently concerned with preserving your and/or your family's wealth, so that others end up having to take care of you:
Envy --- Generosity --- Wasteful
Of course, as Aquinas and Aristotle both note, the virtue won't be always in the precise center of the scale. So if you are in a position in which the source of your wealth is greater and well-assured, you might be even more robustly giving than the term "generous" indicates. This virtue is called "liberality" in Medieval literature, and it's just a different point on the same scale.
Envy --- Liberality --- Wasteful
Point well-made. Certainly, 'generosity''s opposite number is not the vice of envy.
But charity is.
Post a Comment