Saturday, March 12, 2022

"Most Secure Election"? PROVE It!

Seems that some Federal district judge doesn't want you to know stuff.

...Election integrity groups commissioned a report by a computer science professor at the University of Michigan, J. Alex Halderman, who is an election security expert. Halderman produced a 25,000-word report that’s so explosive neither the federal judge in charge of the case nor the U.S. federal government wants it released to the public.

Halderman asserts that Georgia’s electronic voting machines “suffer from specific, highly exploitable vulnerabilities that allow attackers to change votes despite the state’s purported defenses.” Who owns and operates those electronic voting machines in Georgia? Dominion Voting Systems....

...In February of 2022, Halderman sent his complete report only to CISA and to Dominion Voting Systems. What was the response from the federal agency supposedly tasked with keeping America’s voting systems secure, and the company responsible for the machines used in Georgia? CISA and Dominion both filed emergency motions to keep Halderman’s report sealed from the public....

...Halderman’s report contradicts CISA’s public statements about the integrity of the vote in the 2020 election. It directly contradicts Dominion’s factual assertions regarding the security of its voting machines. Simply put: Halderman’s report blows up Dominion’s case, CISA’s credibility, as well as any remaining public trust in America’s election system with its reliance on electronic voting machines....


The good news? The report will probably become public regardless of the machinations of Dominion, the Feds, and this judge.

... Last week, lawyers for Mike Lindell also filed to gain access to the secret Halderman report. Will that actually happen? Judge Totenberg has said that she’s worried that the report would be “subject to disclosure in other litigation.” (Here’s a transcript of the lawyers discussing relevant matters with Judge Totenberg.) That’s frankly none of her business. The business of the judge is to defend the rule of law in a matter of absolutely crucial importance to the future of our republic, and she is failing spectacularly to do so....
This leaves a whole lot more questions than answers on the table. We understand that Dominion has a vital interest in keeping this thing on Funk & Wagnalls' porch. But we also don't give a flying damn about Dominion's interests vis-a-vis the interests of the American voter.

Since the Feds--and their obedient servants, the Press--have declared this to be 'the cleanest election in US history' (a declaration which is risible even to countries in South America), they should PROVE it.

Wanna bet on it?

No comments: