Discuss among yourselves.
HT: Moonbattery
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Wisconsin native. "The true soldier fights not because he hates what is in front of him, but because he loves what is behind him."--GKC "Liberalism is the modern and morbid habit of always sacrificing the normal to the abnormal" --G K Chesterton "The only objective of Liberty is Life" --G K Chesterton "A man can never have too much red wine, too many books, or too much ammunition." -- Rudyard Kipling
About Me
- Dad29
- SUPER-STRAIGHT. Old. Nasty. Likes Chesterton, Gregorian Chant and other real music. Calvin & Hobbes is Great!. Varmint-shooter, and have trained ALL my children in the art.
Fr. Harry
Followers
Gadsden
Don't Tread on Me
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(2262)
-
▼
January
(144)
- Literature in 29 Words
- Ban the Guns, Eh?
- Ethanol Mandate: Buy New Outdoor Power Engines
- William Jennings Bryan on Ethanol
- Convicted Criminal Got a Gun?
- Whither 'Extremist Islam'?
- Wal-Mart and WFMR
- DarthDoyle's Dance
- Compact Consequences
- Are You Heartbroken?
- McCain's Voters
- The "Knowledge" of the Atheists
- House of Correction Report: "Yes/No"--Take Your C...
- Implications of the Walker's Point Murder
- No Mas---No Vote in Fall
- Headlines
- The Politics of Illegals: Where's VanHollen?
- Milwaukee's Near South Side Problem
- England: Orwell's Home Country for a Reason
- Thanks, Mitt!!
- How D'Ya Like That Schoenberg?
- Trouble in City of Madison Courts
- ATF Loses Bid for Summary Judgment vs Red's
- Hildebeeste's Conversion
- Belling: How to Manage the News
- Fed Funding for The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel (!)
- Noonan on the Pundits and the Real Problem
- "The North Pole Ice-Cap Will Melt"
- On Ordaining Homosexuals to the Priesthood
- Rick Majerus: Stupider and Stupider, UPDATED
- Tell Us Again About "Free Trade"
- Crawling Back to "Income Averaging"?
- Lies, and More Lies: Pro-Abort Berceau
- Religious Objections? Right to Life? Drop Dead
- The Party In Gummint Rolls On...
- Levin on Brooks
- Neil Palmer: Drinking Funny Water?
- "Save Money" on Health Insurance?
- 200,000++ March Pro-Life
- Doyle Goes All Hillary
- Recession? Not If You're an H1-B User
- Another Little Lie from the Liturgical Revolutiona...
- And the Good News?
- Doyle's Thieving Causes BIG Problems
- McPain is NOT the Answer
- The Picture You Didn't See in the MSM
- There's A Reason I Stopped Reading This ....
- Jackass Chicago Lawyer to Leave the Country
- We Second K-Lo's Emotion
- Elmbrook's Second Down Play
- Majerus' Stupid Remarks
- "Universal Health?"
- New TV Show!
- The Fallacy of Social Darwinism
- How Cold WAS It?
- Fed Cuts: Effects Include...
- Socialized Medicine + A Nut = More Cost
- The Professor's Equipment
- More Hizbollah, Less Security
- GWB: Another Kick in the Pants of Conservatives
- Virtual Education--What the Newspapers Didn't Tell...
- Over-Spending the Income
- Planning the Archdiocese of Milwaukee
- Echoes: Milwaukee Priest's Article Reviewed
- No Power? Maybe It's the Bad Guys
- St Paul, Lombardi, and Today
- "Best and Brightest"? Nope.
- Shark's Discussion Piece
- The Rest of the Story on Galileo
- Ratzinger on the Liturgy
- "Your Trip Is Cancelled."
- This Guy Understands "The Party of Government"
- The Moonbat NYSlimes and How They Lie
- In-Laws Have Tickets....but....
- Subprimes: Just the Beginning
- IowaHawk Finds Another Violence-Breeding Ground
- Paul Purcell Should Clarify
- Yoo Hoo!! Abp. Dolan!! (Part 4)
- Fred on Guns and Groveling
- Leggies to Corn-a-Hole Taxpayers in Wisconsin
- Obama's Pastor
- Rush: Fix Your Template
- HRC vs. "Uncommitted"
- Inflation Still Here
- Bud Selig Does the Crawfish
- For You Brave New World Types
- Sub-Prime: Not Just a Zit Anymore
- Career Advance for Newspaper Editor
- Murderous Iraq Vets--the NYT's Latest Lie
- "New Media"--a Bellwether?
- Liars Figure, Figures....Are "Special Needs"
- Baby-Killing Contest
- "Red Fred" Roars Back, Goes All Wallace
- What Was the Name...? (Part Two)
- What Was the Name .....?
- What a Difference 40 Years Makes
- Real or Politics? Nuclear Waste CDO's...
- Attention, Ladies! PSA Here!
- Think the Market's Bad?
- GWB Losing Control of Solicitor General?
-
▼
January
(144)
Links
- American Economic Alert
- Boots and Sabers
- Catholic Caveman
- Catholic World News Opinion
- Chesterton & Friends
- Christus Vincit
- FreeRepublicLatestPosts
- Grim's Hall
- John Lott's Website
- Lakeshore Laments
- LawDog Files
- ManWithBlackHat
- Moonbattery
- New Liturgical Movement
- No Runny Eggs
- Other McCain
- Overlawyered
- Planet Moron
- Shark&Shepherd
- Sykes
- Terrence Berres
- The Curt Jester
- The Marquette Warrior
- The Onion: REAL News
- Vox Day
- What the Prayer REALLY Says
- Wigderson
14 comments:
Romans 1
is that a man or a woman holding that sign?
Hmmm, because 2 men holding hands is not natural. 2 men holding guns is an exercise of a Right Guaranteed by The Constitution. Now, no one is trying to ban men holding hands. Sadly, the same can't be said of a Constitutional Right.
Golly - that is quite the philosopical question.
I'm sure a reasonable discussion could be had with this person.
Billiam nailed it.
Yes, Billiam did, with an extension: we are also endowed with a God-given right to protect ourselves, and Catholic teaching recognizes that right beyond even the Constitution.
I have no issue seeing guys holding or showing other signs of affection. It's the implied sexual relationship that's disturbing.
As for two men holding guns, short of personal knowledge of them and their intentions would make me feel extremely uncomfortable. At the gun range or in the woods is one thing. On Locust and King is another. Holstered is generally no issue.
I think two guys holding hands is cute, but two guys holding guns doesn't do it for me.
Come on, people, it is Psych 101
I think we banned holding each others' guns.
What about men holding guns?
I think this picture, even if it is obviously staged propaganda, makes a good case for that being ok...
http://cache.viewimages.com/xc/2638694.jpg?v=1&c=ViewImages&k=2&d=B43C13524355E92812483129250EE173A55A1E4F32AD3138
As for myself, I don't have a problem with men holding hands. It's their life. I may disagree with it, and think it's wrong, but that's as far as I'll push it, other than voting against gay marriage, that is. Also, MZ has a point. I'm all for the legal holding of guns. Thugs, on the other hand, usually don't bother jumping through the same hoops we Law abiding citizens do.
Gee, Billiam, how kind and compassionate of you to say it's OK for them to hold hands... but to let one of them into the hospital room while the other is dying, that's against what?
And when Bush was holding hands with Arabic leaders on his Texas ranch, that's what?
I prefer to hold two guns in my two hands. Imagine Clint Eastwood style.
Post a Comment