Althouse loves to use the condescension-phrase "marriage equality".
The Federalist asks the right questions:
...The would-be polygamist needs only to use the arguments of a
gay-marriage advocate: What kind of moral claim, for instance, does
anyone have to stand in the way of peaceful, consenting adults who call
their union a marriage? Shouldn’t every minority, no matter how
beleaguered, be able to enjoy happiness with the one—or ones—they love?
In a perfect nation, wouldn’t all Americans be immune from the cultural
and religious prejudices of others? Isn’t it a tad judgmental for us to
force every household to comport to our own stifling definition of
family?...
Certainly Althouse understands "equality", so she won't mind if Mead brings home a few extra women.
Right?
By the way, Walker's acquiescence to the continuing erasure of the 10th Amendment doesn't boost one's confidence in his "conservative" credentials, does it?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment