Thursday, August 30, 2012

Taking Down Juan Williams

Juan Williams, who seems to be a nice guy, is apparently competing for the Biden Chair of Stupidosity.

Planet Moron demonstrates:

“Those stories she told about struggles, it’s hard for me to believe.”  --WIlliams

We agree. Multiple sclerosis?  Pffft. Sure, it’s an incurable disease, but you call that struggle? Breast cancer? What kind of a struggle is that? You want struggle?

Try paying for your own birth control. Now that’s a “woman’s issue.”  We bet Anne Romney has never been faced with the prospect of having to choose between a $14 pack of spermicidal jelly and the $40,000-a-year tuition at Georgetown University.  

Those are the choices “real” women have to make every day. Not choosing which difficult MS treatment might best allow you to see your children grow up and marry.

Williams called Biden to ask for more advice.

27 comments:

Saint Revolution said...


Here's a thought, girls.

Stop being sluts and whores and sperm receptacles and, oh, I don't know, get some morals?!?!

...and cut the crap.

When you default on your Sallie Mae FAF signatory ten years from now it's going to be taxpayers who pay the $40K, not you.

That's right. F**king us on top and on the bottom.

Guess you ARE still whores...even if you give up the sex.

Anonymous said...

Taking down Juan Williams?????? WTF

I would rather take down Reince Priebus
for screwing over the Tea Party at the RNC and abandoning a solid conservative politician with a record like this............

://votesmart.org/candidate/key-votes/9301/todd-akin

Reince Priebus is a miserable little pissant

Jim said...

I give kudos to Ann Romney for being a mother and wife, raising five apparently decent young men, keeping a household and supporting her husband. I have nothing against her. I give her the due she deserves as one suffering from MS and surviving cancer.

That said, my brother has MS. He's been in a wheelchair since 1975. He raised a daughter while his wife went to work.

The difference is, "struggling" with MS and cancer is a lot different when your family is worth millions of dollars. "Struggling" to put yourself through college is a lot easier when you can cash in some of your investments instead of having to work.

Anonymous said...

Nobody gives a fuck about your sob story Jim. Please die a slow death, goatfucker.

Anonymous said...

Anony 1:25 a.m., the adults are having a conversation. Go back to the flophouse where you reside.

Dad29 said...

Well, Jimbo, life is a struggle for all of us.

And envy remains a vice.

Jim said...

Indeed, Dadbo, life is a struggle for all of us. But struggle is relative.

Indeed, Dadbo, envy remains a vice. I don't envy the Romney's or any other wealthy person. The "envy" meme is an invention of Frank Luntz.

Terrence Berres said...

Does this mean The Pride of the Yankees depended on Lou Gehrig's salary?

Saint Revolution said...

TO: Jim...and anyone (COMBOX POSTING 1/2):

Wait a minute, Jim.

ComBox went off track here.

Truce for just a minute.

I need to understand.

Are you, Jim, trying to imply that entitled-minded college girls who cannot get free taxpayer-paid entitled birth control are living the same STRUGGLE as a family and individual dealing with MS (as you have had to in your family)?

IOW, an entitled-minded privileged girl (not attending a state university system but attending GeorgeTown) is SUFFERING for not being handed free taxpayer-backed entitled birth control so she can whore around outside of wedlock instead of studying?

On the one hand, liberals scream about what the government is NOT giving them and what they "deserve", i.e., are entitled to, from Uncle Scam. ON THE OTHER HAND, liberals lament why the government is not doing more to help (i.e., throwing money at...) unwed mothers.


With all the due respect it deserves, what does MS have to do with spermicidal jellies?


BTW, Jim.

I have THREE college degrees from state university money thieving systems...NOT private schools...and I paid for EVERY PENNY OF EVERY DEGREE myself.

No student loans. Not one.
No help from parents. None.
No university handout grants nor offered on-campus jobs. Nada.

Nothing.

I worked my ASS off in (and after) college. I sometimes held as many as three jobs, always played out in bands, always had a woman, always paid for her and I myself, and still managed to keep up on studies and graduate. I did ANYTHING I could for money. Some of the crap we experienced as musicians I wouldn't retell in my OWN memoirs. My feet never touched the ground. I needed that cashola. I knew NOTHING about government entitlements...and didn't care.

It's called hard work...which, quite frankly, I'm not quite sure even pays off amidst today's corrupt entitled-minded societal norms...but that's another topic for another day. You, Jim, should understand...being thrown on the street after ~37 years.

But I don't want to digress...

When I needed rubber (I could be talking about tires here, guys), I paid for it myself.

(CONTINUED BELOW...)

Saint Revolution said...


TO: Jim...and anyone (COMBOX POSTING 2/2):

CONTINUED FROM ABOVE...

What's the connection between MS and entitled birth control?
Why do these entitled valley sluts deserve entitled free birth control?

I'm not a Rombama fan. Rombama is buying The White House, yes he is, and, frankly, flip the freemason Obama coin over and there is freemason Romney's puss on the other side.

I'm not a Paul Ryan sellout fan. I've followed Ryan for years. Ryan's a slow sellout to D.C., government, politics, and politicians. Ryan's different now than he was even just four years ago.

Reince Priebus IS a miserable little pissant.

It is ALL broken and one politician is as another...all corrupt, all lying, all thieving, all taking ~$174,000 per year plus undeserved MASSIVE perquisites of MY HARD EARNED MONEY, all promising but not delivering, all living the entitled class at my expense...all my, and your, and every TRUE American and American taxpayer's, enemy(ies).

This free taxpayer-paid entitled birth control crap is simply a METAPHOR for every wrong entitled thing done with our stolen tax dollars by our thieving government.

..out of control public salaries/benefits,
..lunacy manifest prolific social service programs,
..MASSIVE government financial waste and fraud (most recently, GSA, Secret Service...and we KNOW that is simply the tip of the iceberg),
..selling my jobs to ICE (India, China, Europe) via H1-B, PERM, Affirmative Action, and many other programs and visas fucking the very taxpayers who pay the salaries of the politicians who vote these laws into existence (SAINT REVOLUTION'S DEFINITION OF TAXES: FORCED TO SUBSIDIZE YOUR OWN DEMISE),
..domestic paramilitarization build-up of law enforecement at all levels (FOR WHAT REASON?!?!) via DHS using our tax dollars,
..corrupt public justice and court systems via corrupt judges, corrupt lawyers, and corrupt courts representing government in an BIASED environment wherein government REFUSES to police, incriminate, or indict itself,
..etc., etc., etc.

IT WAS NEVER MEANT TO BE THIS WAY.

Jim, you and all the liberals deride me and my passionate revolutionarianism.

There is one over-riding fact, one undeniable truism, one basic actuality, one complete substantiality, one verity I have unobfuscated over and over again, never to receive tolerable nor logical rebuttal regarding, and still cannot logically reconcile: it's your wallet they're stealing from, too.


Peruse other Saint Revolution Dad29 blog comments here.

Jim said...

Are you, Jim, trying to imply that entitled-minded college girls who cannot get free taxpayer-paid entitled birth control are living the same STRUGGLE as a family and individual dealing with MS

No. I'm not the one who conflated MS and birth control. Apparently Planet Moron did that. I see no association.

Unless I am mistaken Ms Fluke was supporting the rule that her health care coverage provided by her school, NOT by tax payers, include birth control at no copay. I'm assuming that Ms Fluke also pays tuition and that a part of that tuition goes to cover health services at the school.

Try to understand this concept: No copay does not mean "free". It means no out of pocket payment at point of service.

The entire premise is false. Not tax-payer funded and not free.

Jim said...

I have THREE college degrees from state university

Well we have something in common. I have two college degrees from state universities. I had scholarships my first year only. I worked from my sophomore year on. My parents gave me $50 a month through undergrad only. No loans, no grants. Scholarships for one year earned through hard academic work.

I paid for EVERY PENNY OF EVERY DEGREE myself.

What state universities operate solely on funds from tuition? I'm pretty sure your education was supplemented by tax payer funds and alumni grants. So let's not go around claiming that "you built" your degrees with no government help.

Jim said...

Why do these entitled valley sluts deserve entitled free birth control?

You may call them sluts if you are so inclined.

However, the birth control is not free. See above.

Jim said...

This free taxpayer-paid entitled birth control

No copay is not free. See above.

Jim said...

Jim, you and all the liberals deride me and my passionate revolutionarianism.

I've never derided you for your beliefs. I often don't agree with them, but I don't use nasty, derogatory language unless I've been bombarded by the same. I don't criticize others in this "community" for their grammar and punctuation (on a f**king blog, for heaven's sake) unless someone else does it first.

Be as revolutionary as you like. Try to be less of a dick.

Dad29 said...

Ms Fluke was supporting the rule that her health care coverage provided by her school, NOT by tax payers, include birth control at no copay....

...No copay does not mean "free". It means no out of pocket payment at point of service.


Irrelevant and immaterial.

G.U. is being forced to pay for birth control for its staff; in addition, its student health-care plan is now required to pick up the tab for birth control for its students.

This is a direct violation of the First Amendment "free exercise" clause.

IOW, if that babe wants to get laid, fine. She can pop the $10.00/month for her own pills.

Jim said...

This is a private university. Students pay tuition and fees. Part of that tuition and fees goes to her health care. She is paying for her own birth control through her tuition and fees. She just doesn't pay a copay when she picks them up because she's already paid with her tuition and fees.

Those who are on staff receive part of their health care coverage as part of their compensation for their work. The rest they pay out of their direct compensation. Either way, they are paying for their own health care. The health care is not free.

All are free to exercise their religious freedom to use the birth control they have already paid for or not use it.

Terrence Berres said...

Ms. Fluke's put the issue this way in her New York Times interview.

"If issues like abortion access and reproductive health are so important to you, why did you choose to go to law school at Georgetown, a Jesuit university?

"You’re saying I should have read the admissions literature more closely? I made the choice to go to Georgetown based on the factors that most students take into account. They offered me a scholarship, and they have the best public-interest law program that I saw, and they have some really fabulous faculty around feminist jurisprudence. It’s unfortunate that women have to choose between comprehensive affordable health care and the best quality education they can have."

Dad29 said...

She just doesn't pay a copay when she picks them up because she's already paid with her tuition and fees.

You are assuming a fact not in evidence. It is my (very recent) experience that college students pay SEPARATELY for health insurance should they wish to have it (most don't; they're covered by parents' policy.)

It is NOT "part of tuition and fees." It is a separate item altogether.

Still, by the way, irrelevant.

No Catholic institution should be forced to pay for abortions, sterilizations, and/or birth control--which, in the case of staff and faculty, they ARE.

Anonymous said...

You will cost the GOP the election with all your anal retentive canards over birth control and gummint intrusion in a woman's personal affairs. Stop your whining already.

Jim said...

No Catholic institution should be forced to pay for abortions, sterilizations, and/or birth control--which, in the case of staff and faculty, they ARE.

No, they are NOT. They are providing compensation to the people who WORK for them. It is less expensive for an employer to pay part or all of health insurance AS COMPENSATION for labor than to pay wages because tax-deductible health insurance is more valuable dollar for dollar than taxable wages. If the Catholic church has such a problem with this, they could easily pay their employees more wages and let them purchase their own health care insurance. It will cost the church more, but either way, the employee pays and the employee makes the choice to use contraception.

Dad29 said...

Jim, there's no response adequate to cure pure idiocy.

Jim said...

Really? Idiocy? You can't respond because you have no logical way to refute what I just wrote.

Do you think any employer gives their employees something for free? Do you think employees work for free?

Do you think that a taxable wage dollar has the same value as a tax-deductible or pre-tax dollar?

Do you think the church makes the decision as to whether an employee uses birth control? If so, why do most Catholics of child-bearing age use birth control?

These are logical questions, not idiocy. A lack of a response suggests the inability to make a response that refutes a VERY CLEAR argument.

Dad29 said...

You have a fixation problem which results in your blind/deaf/dumb problem.

Every institution, Catholic or otherwise, should be able to design its compensation program whatever way they want to.

Obozo, in the face of RFRA and the 1A, has decreed (literally) that Catholic institutions MUST provide abortion, the pill, and sterilization.

No matter how he disguises it, that's precisely the effect under ObozoCare.

It's not up to YOU to tell G.U. how to compensate their employees, nor is it up to Obozo's Statists. In particular, it is not licit for Obozo to force Catholic institutions to provide "goods" which are forbidden by the Church on moral grounds.

End of story. You like irrelevancy and red-herrings; any more of it and your posts on this topic will be bounced.

Jim said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Dad29 said...

You were warned.

Jim said...

Chicken s**t!