Friday, December 02, 2011

Does "Right to Petition" Include "Right to Destroy"?

Althouse doesn't think much of Walker's 'permit-and-bond' requirement for groups who protest.

She doesn't bother to explain when "petition" morphed into "trash and paralyze".

5 comments:

Jim said...

What about the "original' Tea Party?

Amy said...

Yes, 18th century behavior being use to justify destructive liberalism in the 21st century.

Like comparing apples and kumquats, really.

Jim said...

Some 18th century is still glorified. Otherwise, explain the 21st century "Tea Party."

TerryN said...

Explanation: Taxed Enough Already, hence TEA. To call it a glorification of something 18th century is ignorant or sophist.

Terrence Berres said...

On the contrary, Gov. Palin's "party like it's 1773" indicates neither ignorance nor sophism. [link]