Saturday, December 17, 2011

Vote Fraud, No Prosecutions

A condescending and sanctimonious Lefty often posts to this blog, and yammers endlessly about a lawyers' study which found only 6 vote-fraud prosecutions in the last several years, nationwide.  (See combox here)

It is useless to argue with him; the Democrat Party has issued its marching orders, and the mind-numbed robots will carry out the orders.

Meantime, in the real world:

With the GAB saying it will not discard potentially obvious fake names like Mickey Mouse and Adolf Hitler unless specifically asked to do so, and one man admitting that he signed petitions no less than 80 times, the efforts of recall organizers are certainly open to valid criticism. In Ohio, roughly 27% of the signatures gathered to force a referendum on collective bargaining legislation were found fraudulent.

One may argue that the 80x signer did what he did legally.  And that's true:  under Wisconsin law, one may sign as many petitions as one wants.  There IS text which makes his action illegal, but "intent" is required.  So he probably will not be prosecuted.

As to Mickey, Adolf, Minnie, and Scrooge:  there is no DA anywhere--Republican or Democrat--who can prosecute the people who signed these names, for the obvious reason:  there is no evidence available.

As to Ohio:  same story.  Prosecution requires that one must identify the perp.

So "No Prosecutions" is just horse-crap.  But the Democrats--the party which is alive largely because of vote-fraud (and associated criminal activity not defined as "fraud") will march on, screeching hysterically.

It's what they do.

3 comments:

Jim said...

Question:

Did Mickey, Adolf, Minnie or Scrooge show up at any polling place to vote?

If you don't understand the difference between voter fraud and registration fraud, then you are ignorant on the subject and shouldn't be claiming that someone who tries to explain the difference is "condescending and sanctimonious".

You didn't mention that it was a REPUBLICAN lawyers study and that it was over TEN "several" years.

It is useless to argue with him

Uh, that's because I have presented FACTS which you have not even attempted to argue against. Go ahead, give it a shot.

I have received no marching orders and there is no such thing as the "Democrat Party".

Rather than marching orders, I read the stuff you and others post and I go and research the topic and find the facts. Then I bring them back to the original post so that they can be shared with others.

Saint Revolution said...

Jim.

Jim. Jim.

Jim. Jim. Jim. Jim. Jim. Jim. Jim. Jim. Jim. Jim. Jim. Jim. Jim. Jim. Jim. Jim. Jim. Jim. Jim. Jim. Jim. Jim. Jim. Jim. Jim. Jim. Jim. Jim. Jim. Jim. Jim.

...Jim.

You're a democrat from the democratic party.

By definition you're a condescending sanctimonious lying two-faced corrupt bastard.

C'mon Jim. Get with your corrupt program.

Dial 1.800.IMA.FRAUD if you have any questions RE: how to cash in on your corruptness. Our thugs are waiting for your call.

Anonymous said...

Jesus would be proud, Matthew Chapt 25, the condecending drivel, "A man's character may be learned from the adjectives which he habitually uses in conversation.
Mark Twain so we now know what it looks like to watch an empire crumble in real time, the tribe of Calvinist "pigs" are getting desperate..