Esenberg writes a gentlemanly essay on why Judge Sumi is 1) wrong; 2) wrong; and 3) wrong in her arrogation-of-powers decision.
It starts with Marbury, by the way--which is to say that the Legislature's action was not only licit, but backed by ~200 years of judicial precedent.
Until Sumi.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
The definitive take as proferred by a CONSERVATIVE! But if you want to keep being delusional, be my guest!
Judge-ette Sumi confuses the Rule of Law with the Droolings of Judges.
And you call ME 'delusional.'
I think Esenberg avoids responding to the commenters who make the sharpest points.
Post a Comment